Defendant

Hyundai Motor

1 case as defendant.

Cases
1
Active
0
1 closed
Filed
—
Top venue
E D Mich Judge Robert H Cleland
1 case

Company profile

Company overview
Hyundai Motor Company (현대자동차 주식회사), commonly "Hyundai," is a South Korean automaker founded December 29, 1967 and headquartered at 12 Heolleung-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul. It is publicly listed on the Korea Exchange (005380) and sits within Hyundai Motor Group; Executive Chair Euisun Chung is the top executive. Company disclosures put FY2025 revenue at ₩186.25 trillion (roughly US$130 billion) with about 72,700–73,000 employees at the Hyundai Motor Company level (FY2025). Some third-party databases show much larger headcounts because they aggregate the wider group.

Products / operations
Hyundai designs, manufactures and sells passenger and commercial vehicles worldwide. Model lines include the Elantra/Avante, Sonata, Tucson, Santa Fe and Palisade; the Genesis premium brand; the IONIQ battery-electric sub-brand built on the E-GMP platform; and the "N" performance line. It also produces hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles (NEXO, XCIENT Fuel Cell trucks), operates captive vehicle-financing operations, and holds a majority stake in Boston Dynamics. Global sales were roughly 4.1 million units in 2025.

Patent-litigation posture
Hyundai is an operating company and, in this database, a pure defensive party: 0 cases as plaintiff, 1 as defendant. It does not appear as a patent assertion plaintiff; the single tracked matter is part of a broader automotive supplier/OEM patent campaign in which Hyundai is a co-defendant.

Notable case
Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Delphi Corp. et al. (No. 2:08-cv-11048, consolidated with 10-cv-10647), E.D. Mich. before Judge Robert H. Cleland. Hyundai Motor America was among roughly a dozen OEM and supplier defendants; ATI asserted bladder/seat-based occupant weight-sensing and airbag-control patents ('945, '516, '080, '029), citing vehicles including the 2007 Hyundai Santa Fe. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants in March 2011; ATI appealed (Fed. Cir. No. 11-1292). Notably, the venue was ATI's home district, Eastern Michigan, not a plaintiff-friendly Texas forum. ATI, founded by David Breed, has been described in patent-litigation analyses as a non-practicing patent holder that asserted crash-sensor portfolios against numerous automakers.

Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Delphi Corp. et al.

judgment; remanded for settlement
Docket:
2:08-cv-11048; 2:10-cv-10647
Patents:6850824

ATI's consolidated E.D. Mich. actions against Delphi and other automotive defendants were linked to the '824 patent. Judgment was adverse to ATI, and portions of the summary judgment were appealed and ultimately remanded for settlement.