Defendant

Hisense USA Corporation

1 case as defendant.

Also appears as a plaintiff in 1 case View as plaintiff

Company profile

Hisense USA Corporation is the United States-based subsidiary of Hisense Group, a multinational consumer electronics and appliance manufacturer headquartered in Qingdao, China. The parent company was founded in 1969. Hisense USA, established in the early 2000s, serves as the U.S. headquarters and recently relocated to Alpharetta, Georgia, in January 2026. It is a private company and a key part of Hisense Group's global operations, which span over 160 countries.

As an operating company, Hisense USA markets and distributes a wide array of electronics and home appliances in North America. The company's primary product line is televisions, including ULED, MiniLED, and Laser TV models, reflecting its parent company's position as a major global TV manufacturer. Beyond home entertainment, Hisense USA offers a full range of home appliances, such as refrigerators, ranges, dishwashers, air conditioners, and dehumidifiers. The products are sold through major North American retailers.

The company's patent litigation posture, based on the provided data, is that of an operating company taking preemptive legal action. Hisense USA is listed as a plaintiff in one tracked case and has not been recorded as a defendant. This indicates that rather than being a target of patent assertions in this database, the company has initiated litigation itself. The single lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, where the company's U.S. headquarters are located.

The notable case tracked is Hisense USA Corporation v. Cogent Insights Licensing Inc., filed in late 2025. By acting as the plaintiff, Hisense USA appears to be taking a proactive stance in its dispute with Cogent Insights Licensing Inc., a strategy often used by operating companies to challenge the validity or infringement of patents being asserted against them. This single action in its home district suggests a defensive, rather than offensive, patent strategy.

Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al.

Judgment
Docket:
2:23-cv-00477-RWS-RSP
Filed:
2023-10-10
Patents:7557788

A jury trial concluded in January 2026. The jury found that the defendants did not infringe the asserted patents, including the '788 patent. Additionally, one of the asserted patents was found to be invalid.