Defendant

AU Optronics Corporation

1 case as defendant.

Company profile

AU Optronics Corporation (AUO) is a major Taiwanese manufacturer of optoelectronic solutions, founded in 1996. Headquartered in Hsinchu, Taiwan, AUO is a public company listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE: 2409). The company has a global workforce of over 41,000 employees and reported consolidated net revenues of USD 9.04 billion in 2025. AUO operates globally with locations across Asia, the United States, and Europe.

AUO is a leading producer of thin-film-transistor liquid-crystal display (TFT-LCD) panels, offering a wide range of display applications. The company's products are used in televisions, monitors, laptops, mobile devices, automotive displays, and industrial applications. In addition to its core display business, AUO has diversified into other areas, including solar energy solutions, where it manufactures products like PV modules and provides solar asset management. The company is also developing advanced technologies such as Micro LED and AmLED for next-generation displays, targeting smart mobility, healthcare, and retail sectors.

As a large operating company, AUO's patent litigation profile is primarily defensive. The provided data shows AU Optronics Corporation as a defendant in one tracked case, consistent with a manufacturer being targeted by a patent assertion entity. This suit, Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, a venue commonly used by patent plaintiffs. AUO holds a substantial patent portfolio itself, with over 18,700 global patents approved as of early 2019, reflecting its significant research and development activities.

Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al.

Judgment
Docket:
2:23-cv-00477-RWS-RSP
Filed:
2023-10-10
Patents:7557788

A jury trial concluded in January 2026. The jury found that the defendants did not infringe the asserted patents, including the '788 patent. Additionally, one of the asserted patents was found to be invalid.