Defendant

Code200, UAB

2 cases as defendant.

Cases
2
Active
0
2 closed
Filed
2019
Top venue
E.D. Texas Marshall
1 case
Also appears as a plaintiff in 5 cases → View as plaintiff

Company profile

Code200, UAB — Company Profile

Overview. Code200, UAB (styled "code200, UAB") is a private Lithuanian limited liability company registered in Vilnius (Švitrigailos g. 32) on 19 November 2018; registration code 304950857. It is a group affiliate rather than a standalone business: court filings state that Code200, Metacluster LT, Oxysales and Teso LT are all owned by Coretech (UAB coretech lt), the structure behind the Oxylabs web-data business. Lithuanian registry aggregators list 6 insured employees and 2025 sales of roughly €22.3 million with net profit of about €1.29 million. The Oxylabs brand itself reports 201–500 employees (some trackers ~480–500) at the same Vilnius address.

Operations. Code200 is an operating infrastructure entity, not a shell. Oxylabs' own filings describe Code200 as the provider of the group's data center proxy network, with affiliate Oxysales handling sales support for that product and Metacluster's Real-Time Crawler service. The accused services are "large-scale web data extraction" offerings: a data center proxy pool marketed at 2M+ IPs with city-level targeting, plus residential proxies, ISP proxies, Scraper APIs and web-unblocking tools used for market research, ad verification, pricing and SEO monitoring. Oxylabs has been part of the Tesonet company-building group and in 2026 took its first outside investment (€113.6M from Warburg Pincus at a €3.1B valuation).

Litigation posture. Our tracked data shows a single case: Code200, UAB et al. v. Luminati Networks Ltd., filed at the PTAB on 4 September 2020 — one plaintiff-side petition, zero defendant-side entries. That pattern reflects a group defending itself by challenging a competitor's patents rather than an NPE asserting an acquired portfolio. External context shows the same dispute also ran in the Eastern District of Texas, where Luminati/Bright Data sued Code200 and affiliates (2:19-cv-396), a plaintiff-friendly venue.

Notable cases. IPR2020-01506 (U.S. 10,469,614) was filed jointly with Teso LT, Metacluster and Oxysales, one of at least five IPRs those entities filed against Luminati/Bright Data proxy patents from July 2020 onward. Related proceedings (e.g. IPR2022-00103, U.S. 11,044,342) ended with the Federal Circuit affirming unpatentability.

Bright Data Ltd. (f/k/a Luminati Networks Ltd.) v. Code200, UAB et al.

stayed; Metacluster dismissed with prejudice
Docket:
2:19-cv-00396-JRG
Filed:
2019-12-06

Patent infringement action asserting the '511 patent and the '968 patent added June 9, 2020, against Code200, Oxysales, and Metacluster. Claims against Metacluster LT, UAB were dismissed with prejudice on July 2, 2021, and the case was stayed pending USPTO proceedings; the court denied Defendants' Section 101 motion to dismiss.

Bright Data Ltd. v. Code200, UAB et al.

affirmed; rehearing denied
Docket:
2023-2144 (consolidated with 2023-2145, 2023-2146, 2023-2147, 2023-2414, 2023-2415, 2023-2442, 2023-2443)
Terminated:
2025-10-01

Bright Data appealed the PTAB's final written decisions in IPR2022-00353 and related IPRs. The Federal Circuit consolidated the appeals and on August 1, 2025, affirmed the Board's role-based constructions, holding all challenged claims of the '344 and sibling patents 11,044,342; 10,257,319; and 10,484,510 unpatentable. Rehearing en banc was denied October 1, 2025.