Litigation

Untitled case

Pending

IPR2026-00147

Court
PTAB
Filed
2026

Patents at issue (1)

Summary

A Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) case concerning US patent 12010174, identified by case number IPR2026-00147, is currently pending.

Case overview & background

Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.

Case Overview and Background: IPR2026-00147

IPR2026-00147 is an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding currently pending before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The case concerns the patentability of U.S. Patent 12010174. On May 6, 2026, the PTAB issued a decision granting institution for this IPR, meaning the Board determined that at least one challenged claim is more likely than not unpatentable, thus initiating the trial phase.

Despite extensive search efforts, the specific Petitioner and Patent Owner for IPR2026-00147 could not be definitively identified from publicly available aggregated data or news articles at this time. Information on the PTAB's Open Data Portal for this specific IPR indicates an associated application number 17/408,549 and a "PO/Respondent Tech Center: 2400" (Computer Networks, Multiplex communication, Video Distribution, and Security), but does not explicitly name the parties involved in this particular proceeding. Similarly, efforts to locate a precise technical sketch or abstract for U.S. Patent 12010174 through public patent databases did not yield immediate results, suggesting that detailed information about the patent's subject matter is not readily available through general searches at this time.

The procedural posture of this case is significant due to recent shifts in PTAB practice. Since October 2025, decisions on whether to institute IPR and Post-Grant Review (PGR) trials are now made by the USPTO Director, John Squires, a departure from the previous panel-centric model. This centralization, along with updated guidance, emphasizes considerations such as U.S. manufacturing footprint of the patent owner and petitioner, and discourages using IPRs as a "second bite at the apple" after losing in district court. While the specific reasons for institution in IPR2026-00147 are not yet publicly detailed beyond the fact that it was granted, the current environment suggests a more stringent approach to IPR institution overall, making the grant of institution in this case notable in itself. Without identified parties or a technical sketch of the patent, the precise industry impact, accused product, or any related district court litigation remains unclear.

Key legal developments & outcome

Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.

Key Legal Developments and Outcome for Patent Infringement Litigation Involving U.S. Patent No. 12,010,174

This case involves patent infringement litigation concerning U.S. Patent No. 12,010,174, currently active in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alongside a parallel inter partes review (IPR) proceeding at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

District Court Litigation: Smart Speaker LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLC

Filing & Initial Pleadings:

  • Complaint Filed (2025-07-11): Smart Speaker LLC (Plaintiff and Patent Owner) initiated a patent infringement lawsuit against Amazon.com Services LLC (Defendant) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 2:25-cv-00707. The complaint includes allegations of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 12,010,174, among possibly other patents.
  • Motion to Dismiss (Pre-Trial Motion): Amazon.com Services LLC filed a motion to dismiss in part Smart Speaker LLC's First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. Smart Speaker LLC filed a response in opposition to this motion. The outcome of this motion is not yet publicly detailed in the provided search results.

Discovery Milestones:

  • The docket entries for the district court case as of December 10, 2025, indicate joint motions for extensions of time to file a proposed e-discovery order, which were granted, suggesting discovery planning is underway.

Current Posture:
The district court case remains open and is in the early litigation phases, with discovery and motion practice ongoing.

Parallel PTAB IPR Proceeding: IPR2026-00147

IPR Filing and Institution:

  • IPR Petition Filed: Amazon.com Services LLC, the defendant in the parallel district court litigation, filed a petition for inter partes review, IPR2026-00147, challenging the patentability of U.S. Patent No. 12,010,174. The petitioner (Amazon) and the patent owner (Smart Speaker LLC) in this IPR are the same parties involved in the district court litigation.
  • Institution Granted (2026-05-06): The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a decision granting institution of IPR2026-00147 on May 6, 2026. This means the PTAB found that Amazon had demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that at least one challenged claim of U.S. Patent No. 12,010,174 is unpatentable, and the IPR will proceed to a full review of the challenged claims.

Effect on Litigation:
The institution of IPR2026-00147 means that the patentability of U.S. Patent No. 12,010,174 is being challenged concurrently in two forums: the PTAB (based on prior art patents and printed publications) and the Eastern District of Texas (likely based on broader invalidity grounds). The district court may consider a stay of proceedings pending the outcome of the IPR, though no such motion or ruling has been identified in the provided information.

Outcome:
Both the district court litigation and the IPR are actively pending. No final judgment, settlement, or trial verdict has been reached in the district court case, and the IPR proceeding is in its early stages following institution.

Plaintiff representatives

Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

In the Inter Partes Review (IPR) case IPR2026-00147, the Petitioner is Amazon.com Services LLC.

Based on available information, Alex Yap is listed as counsel for the Petitioner. To provide full details for Alex Yap and identify other potential counsel, further investigation into specific firm affiliations, office locations, and relevant experience is needed. Filings for IPRs typically list multiple attorneys.

At this time, additional counsel beyond Alex Yap for Amazon.com Services LLC have not been explicitly identified in the provided search results. Details regarding their firm, office location, and specific patent litigation experience require further investigation.

Defendant representatives

Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

The defendant in IPR2026-00147, the Patent Owner, is Smart Speaker LLC.

The counsel of record identified for Smart Speaker LLC is:

  • Name: Peter Lambrianakos
    • Role: Counsel for Patent Owner
    • Firm and office location: Further details regarding Peter Lambrianakos's firm and office location require additional investigation.
    • Relevant patent litigation experience: A detailed one-line note on relevant patent litigation experience or notable past cases for Peter Lambrianakos is not readily available in the provided search results and would require further investigation.