Patent 12010174

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Smart Speaker LLC

1 active
Trial Instituted
Filed
Nov 21, 2025
Last modified
May 6, 2026
Petitioner
Amazon.com Services LLC
Patent owner
Smart Speaker LLC
Outcome
Institution Granted

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There is one AIA trial proceeding on file for US patent 12010174, currently in "Trial Instituted" status. This means the patent has not yet been "hardened" by surviving an IPR, nor have any claims been invalidated. For a defendant, this means the patent's claims are still actively being challenged at the PTAB, and an IPR-based defense may still be viable if the PTAB finds claims unpatentable.

IPR2026-00147 — Amazon.com Services LLC v. Smart Speaker LLC

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: 2025-11-21
  • Status: Trial Instituted. This means the PTAB has determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that at least one of the challenged claims is unpatentable.
  • Judge panel: Not explicitly stated in the provided documents, though John A. Squires, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, issued the Notice of Decisions on Institution that included IPR2026-00147.
  • Petition grounds: Not explicitly detailed in the provided information, but IPRs typically challenge claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 (anticipation) and/or 103 (obviousness).
  • Institution decision: Instituted on 2026-05-06. The PTAB granted institution because the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one of the challenged claims.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): Not yet issued. The trial is ongoing.
  • Settlement / termination: Not settled or terminated. The case is still active.
  • Appeal: Not applicable yet as no Final Written Decision has been issued.
  • Defensive value: The institution of this IPR indicates that the PTAB found sufficient merit in Amazon.com Services LLC's challenge to proceed to trial. This means that the patentability of at least some claims of US12010174 is in question. A defendant facing assertion of this patent should closely monitor the outcome of this IPR, as a successful challenge could invalidate claims and significantly weaken the patent owner's position.

Strategic summary

Currently, the patent US12010174 has one ongoing IPR proceeding, IPR2026-00147, initiated by Amazon.com Services LLC. The PTAB has instituted the trial, meaning it found a "reasonable likelihood" that at least one challenged claim is unpatentable. As of now, no claims of US12010174 have been canceled or definitively sustained through a Final Written Decision. Therefore, all claims of US12010174 remain untested in a final PTAB judgment.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, if Amazon.com Services LLC proceeds to a Final Written Decision, they (and their privies) would be estopped under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) from asserting in other venues any invalidity grounds they raised or reasonably could have raised during this IPR. For other potential defendants, this means that prior-art grounds not asserted or those that could not have been reasonably raised by Amazon.com Services LLC in IPR2026-00147 would still be available. There is no clear pattern of multiple IPR filings on this specific patent from the same petitioner in the provided data, and no information about the patent owner's PTAB appeal aggressiveness or involvement of defensive aggregators like Unified Patents is available for this specific proceeding.

Recommended next steps

Given that IPR2026-00147 is in the "Trial Instituted" stage, a defendant should:

  • Closely monitor the progress of IPR2026-00147. The PTAB has a statutory one-year deadline to issue a Final Written Decision from the date of institution. The institution date was 2026-05-06, so the Final Written Decision is expected by 2027-05-06.
  • Review the institution decision for IPR2026-00147 to understand the specific claims challenged and the prior art and statutory bases (§ 102/§ 103) on which the PTAB found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability. This information, while not fully detailed in the provided summary, would be crucial for assessing the strength of the petitioner's arguments and the potential impact on the patent's claims.
  • If facing current assertion, assess whether the claims being asserted are among those challenged in IPR2026-00147. The outcome of this proceeding will directly impact the validity of those claims.

Generated 5/27/2026, 12:46:05 AM