Patent litigation attorney
W. Karl Renner
25 tracked appearances — 12 plaintiff · 13 defendant.
Specialty & background
W. Karl Renner is a Principal at Fish & Richardson in Washington, D.C., where he is the leader of the firm's Post-Grant Practice. His work is heavily concentrated on administrative proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR). He has been involved in over 900 post-grant matters, representing both patent owners and challengers. His technical focus is broad, covering electrical, computer-related, physics, and mechanical arts. This includes extensive experience in technologies such as internet applications, network systems, data storage, microprocessors, mobile communications, and semiconductors.
While the provided case list shows a single appearance for a plaintiff in district court litigation, Renner's practice is overwhelmingly centered on PTAB proceedings, which often run parallel to district court cases. He is recognized as one of the nation's leading and most active PTAB practitioners, frequently representing petitioners challenging patent validity. His work often involves advising on defensive tactics against competitor IP and coordinating PTAB strategy with ongoing litigation. Renner is a founding director and past president of the PTAB Bar Association.
Renner has spent his career at Fish & Richardson, where he also serves on the firm's management committee. He is frequently recognized as a leading attorney for post-grant proceedings by publications such as Managing Intellectual Property and Chambers USA. His extensive experience is reflected in numerous publications and speaking engagements focused on PTAB practice and strategy.
Education and bar admission information for W. Karl Renner is not consistently available in the sources reviewed. Prior to his legal career, he gained engineering experience at the U.S. Department of Energy.
Firms
Roles
- lead counsel11
- Lead Counsel6
- counsel3
- Counsel3
- of counsel2
Cases (25)
- Δ defendantAmphenol Corp. v. Credo Technology Group Ltd.Fish & Richardson · counsel
- Δ defendantAmphenol Corporation v. Credo Technology Group Ltd.Fish & Richardson · lead counsel
- π plaintiffApple Inc. v. Topwire LLCFish & Richardson · lead counsel
- Δ defendantBlackbird Tech LLC v. Wahoo Fitness, LLCFish & Richardson · counsel
- Δ defendantCollective Minds Gaming Co. Ltd. v. Ironburg Inventions Ltd.DLA Piper (US) · lead counsel
- Δ defendantIntellectual Ventures I LLC et al. v. American Airlines, Inc.Fish & Richardson · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantLedup Manufacturing Group Ltd v. Seasonal Specialties LLCFish & Richardson · lead counsel
- π plaintiffNiantic, Inc. v. ImagineAR, Inc.Fish & Richardson · lead counsel
- π plaintiffPetitioner Not Listed v. AlmondNet, Inc.Fish & Richardson · lead counsel
- π plaintiffSamsung v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLCFish & Richardson · lead counsel
- π plaintiffTAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED et al. v. Marlin Semiconductor LtdFish & Richardson · lead counsel
- π plaintiffToyota Motor Corporation v. Bunker Hill Technologies, LLCFish & Richardson · of counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents LLC v. Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology IncRichards, Layton & Finger · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents PTAB Data v. Advanced Coding Technologies LLClead counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Tianma Microelectronics Co LtdFish & Richardson · Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.Fish & Richardson · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.Fish & Richardson · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUnited Services Automobile Association v. Auto Telematics Ltd.Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseFish & Richardson · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled casecounsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseFish & Richardson · Counsel
- Δ defendantVirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Fish & Richardson · of counsel
- Δ defendantVolex PLC v. Credo Technology Group LtdFish & Richardson · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantVolex PLC v. Credo Technology Group Ltd.Fish & Richardson · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantWacom Co. Ltd. v. Shenzhen Qianfenyi Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd.Fish & Richardson · lead counsel