Patent litigation attorney

Philip A. Rovner

13 tracked appearances — 2 plaintiff · 11 defendant.

Specialty & background

I'll research this attorney's background before drafting.

Philip A. Rovner — Patent Litigation Practice Summary

Specialty and focus. Rovner is a Delaware generalist commercial and IP trial lawyer whose patent docket spans a wide technical range rather than a single silo. Tracked matters include network security and firewall software (Juniper v. Palo Alto Networks; British Telecom v. Palo Alto Networks), consumer electronics and streaming/media delivery (Sonos v. Denon; DISH Technologies v. Philo; Adeia Media Holdings v. BAMTech), enterprise software and e-commerce patents (Express Mobile v. SAP; Cyberfone Systems v. E*TRADE), wireless audio and standards-adjacent technologies, rail/mechanical systems (Siemens Mobility v. Metrom Rail), medical devices (Unified Patents v. Cleveland Medical Devices; firm-bio matters for Baxter and Nova Biomedical), and automotive/sensor technologies (Greenthread v. Continental; Aptiv). His firm bio and IAM Patent 1000 entries describe him generally as applying "broad-ranging contentious experience and sharpened trial instincts" across commercial and IP cases, and he co-authored the litigation-timeline chapter of ANDA Litigation: Strategies and Tactics for Pharmaceutical Patent Litigators, indicating Hatch-Waxman experience as well.

Side preference. The tracked sample is heavily defendant-side — 11 defendant appearances versus 2 plaintiff — because much of his patent work is as Delaware local counsel to out-of-state firms defending operating companies sued by NPEs/PAEs (AlmondNet/AT&T, Greenthread/Continental, DISH/Philo, Cyberfone/E*TRADE, Express Mobile/SAP). That is a forum role, not an ideological one: the same docket and his firm bio show substantial plaintiff-side work, including for licensing entities (Adeia Media Holdings v. BAMTech) and operating companies (Sonos, British Telecom, Rosco). He also serves as lead Delaware counsel in cases such as Siemens Mobility v. Metrom Rail and Juniper v. Palo Alto Networks, so his practice is best characterized as both-sides Delaware forum counsel rather than a dedicated defense or NPE shop.

Firm context. Rovner has spent his patent litigation career at Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP in Wilmington, Delaware, where he is a partner. The IAM Patent 1000 rankings consistently group him with firm litigators Bindu Ann Palapura and David E. Moore as the firm's core patent-litigation team. No prior firm history is reliably sourced in the public record.

Notable matters and outcomes. His firm bio highlights two verified plaintiff-side trial wins: Sonos v. Denon Electronics (D. Del.), where a jury found infringement of three Sonos patents, willful infringement, and upheld validity; and XpertUniverse v. Cisco Systems (D. Del.), a $70 million plaintiff's verdict in a fraud action. He also lists successful defense verdicts for Roche Diagnostics in a trade-secret/confidentiality trial and for Baxter in ANDA litigation, and a $70M-scale Chancery win for Athilon Capital. On the tracked docket, Juniper v. Palo Alto Networks (D. Del.) ended in a 2014 stipulated dismissal with prejudice alongside termination of related PTAB proceedings; Rosco, Inc. v. Velvac produced a 2012 claim-construction opinion on a mirror-mounting patent. In the Metrom Rail v. Siemens Mobility family, the district case was transferred/severed to S.D.N.Y., and parallel IPRs resulted in final written decisions invalidating most challenged claims, with the Federal Circuit affirming in part and reversing in part on the remaining claims (Fed. Cir. No. 24-2223).

PTAB / IPR experience. PTAB activity appears in his docket but is not a dominant part of it: he is tracked in Unified Patents v. Cleveland Medical Devices (a PTAB-side matter) and his name appears in PTAB filings connected to the Juniper/Palo Alto Networks and Siemens Mobility/Metrom Rail disputes. I found no public source confirming that he personally appears as lead IPR counsel or that he is a registered patent practitioner before the USPTO, so that should be verified rather than assumed.

Bar and education. Admitted in New York (1988) and Delaware (1993), with an Illinois admission also listed in Martindale; J.D., Fordham University (1987); B.A., University of Pennsylvania (1981).

Firms

Roles

  • local counsel6
  • Local Counsel3
  • lead counsel2
  • Potential Local Counsel1
  • lead local counsel1

Cases (13)