Counsel registry
Potter Anderson & Corroon
35 case appearances — 4 as plaintiff counsel · 31 as defendant counsel.
Firm overview
Potter Anderson & Corroon: Patent Litigation Summary
Firm Overview:
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP is a prominent regional law firm headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware. As one of the oldest firms in the state, it has established itself as a major player in Delaware's legal landscape. While not an AmLaw 100 firm, Potter Anderson is one of the largest in Delaware, with over 100 attorneys. The firm operates from a single office in Wilmington, strategically positioned to practice extensively before the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, a key venue for patent litigation. The firm is consistently recognized by Chambers and Partners for its intellectual property practice in Delaware.
IP Litigation Specialty and Side Preference:
The firm's patent litigation practice is a significant component of its broader litigation department. It has a well-regarded, balanced practice, representing both plaintiffs and defendants in patent infringement disputes. The firm’s website states they are involved in well over 100 intellectual property cases at any given time. This experience is reflected in the single tracked case, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals AS v. Zydus Cadila et al., where the firm acted as local counsel for the plaintiff. The firm has experience across a wide range of technology sectors, including pharmaceuticals (ANDA), medical devices, telecommunications, software, and microprocessor technology.
Notable Cases and PTAB Practice:
While the provided case list is limited, public records indicate the firm's role in significant patent litigation. As local counsel, they have represented major technology companies such as Intel in a defense verdict win against a $2 billion infringement claim by AVM Technologies. The firm also represented IBM as Delaware counsel in a case against Groupon that resulted in an $82.5 million verdict for IBM. The firm’s attorneys are noted for their deep experience in the District of Delaware. Though comprehensive data on the firm's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practice is not readily available, a 2019 report by Managing Intellectual Property noted the firm's involvement in 59 IPR petitions, indicating a presence in this specialized forum. More recent filings show continued representation of clients in IPR proceedings.
Key Partners:
The firm's intellectual property group is led by seasoned litigators. David E. Moore, mentioned in the tracked case, is a highly ranked patent litigator in Delaware by Chambers and Partners and is noted for his experience in cases involving medical devices and telecommunications. Bindu A. Palapura, also listed in the tracked case, is recognized for her work in patent and trade secret litigation, particularly in the pharmaceutical, chemical, and software sectors. Other key partners recognized by industry publications like IAM Patent 1000 include Philip A. Rovner, an experienced trial attorney, and Dr. Janet E. Reed, who leads the IP transactional and counseling practice with a focus on biotechnology and life sciences.
Attorneys
Roles
- local counsel45
- Local Counsel19
- Potential Local Counsel2
- lead local counsel1
- lead counsel1
Cases (35)
- Δ defendantAlmondnet, Inc. et al. v. AT&T Inc.Philip A. Rovner · local counsel
- Δ defendantAlmondNet, Inc. et al. v. LiveIntent, Inc.David E. Moore · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantBlackbird Tech LLC v. TomTom, Inc.David M. Fry · local counsel
- Δ defendantCyberfone Systems, LLC v. American Airlines, Inc.Richard L. Horwitz · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantCyberfone Systems, LLC v. Bank of America Corp.Richard L. Horwitz · local counsel
- Δ defendantCyberfone Systems, LLC v. E*TRADE Financial CorporationPhilip A. Rovner · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantDISH Technologies L.L.C. et al. v. A Parent Media Co. Inc. et al.David E. Moore · local counsel
- π plaintiffDISH Technologies L.L.C. et al. v. fuboTV Inc.Benjamin J. Schladweiler · Local Counsel
- π plaintiffDISH Technologies L.L.C. et al. v. The Washington PostDavid E. Moore · lead local counsel
- Δ defendantDish Technologies L.L.C. v. Frndly TV, Inc.David E. Moore · local counsel
- Δ defendantDish Technologies L.L.C. v. fuboTV Inc.Jack B. Blumenfeld · local counsel
- Δ defendantDISH Technologies L.L.C. v. Philo, Inc.Philip A. Rovner · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantDISH Technologies, LLC et al. v. A Parent Media Co. Inc. et al.David E. Moore · local counsel
- Δ defendantDISH Technologies, LLC et al. v. iFIT Health & Fitness, Inc.David E. Moore · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantDisintermedation Services Inc. v. Capital One Financial CorporationJack B. Blumenfeld · local counsel
- Δ defendantEXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. ADP, LLCJack B. Blumenfeld · local counsel
- Δ defendantEXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. Box, Inc.John V. Gorman · local counsel
- Δ defendantEXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. Dropbox, Inc.Jack B. Blumenfeld · local counsel
- Δ defendantEXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. Facebook, Inc.John V. Gorman · local counsel
- Δ defendantEXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.A. Martina Hufnal · local counsel
- Δ defendantEXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. Microsoft CorporationDavid E. Moore · local counsel
- Δ defendantEXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. SAP SEPhilip A. Rovner · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantGigex, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Richard L. Horwitz · local counsel
- Δ defendantGreenthread, LLC v. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.Philip A. Rovner · Potential Local Counsel
- Δ defendantGreenthread, LLC v. Intel Corporation et al.Kelly E. Farnan · local counsel
- Δ defendantGreenthread, LLC v. Robert Bosch LLCDavid E. Moore · local counsel
- Δ defendantIntellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp. et al.Richard L. Horwitz · lead counsel
- Δ defendantIntent IQ LLC v. Viant Technology LLCBindu A. Palapura · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantIntent IQ LLC v. Viant Technology LLCDavid E. Moore · Local Counsel
- Δ defendantNL Giken Inc. v. VIZIO, Inc. et al.David E. Moore · local counsel
- Δ defendantOpenTV, Inc. v. Pinterest, Inc.Jack B. Blumenfeld · local counsel
- Δ defendantVB Assets, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al.David E. Moore · local counsel
- Δ defendantVB ASSETS, LLC v. Apple Inc.David E. Moore · local counsel
- π plaintiffVeloxis Pharmaceuticals AS v. Zydus Cadila et al.David E. Moore · local counsel
- π plaintiffVerance Corp. v. Digimarc Corp.Richard L. Horwitz · local counsel