Patent litigation attorney
Kelly Hughes
24 tracked appearances — 23 plaintiff · 1 defendant.
Specialty & background
I'll research this attorney before drafting.
Kelly Hughes — patent litigation profile
Kelly Hughes is Senior Patent Counsel at Unified Patents, LLC, where her practice centers on Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings — inter partes review and ex parte reexamination — rather than conventional district court litigation. The technology mix in her tracked matters reflects Unified's portfolio of challenges and skews toward electronics, software, and communications: Wi-Fi standard-related patents (the Malikie Innovations matters), semiconductors and display (Marlin Semiconductor, Samsung Display, Advanced Integrated Circuit Process), data compression and storage (Realtime Data), fintech and payment systems (Monticello Enterprises, AuthWallet), consumer products and medical devices (Monahan Products/UPPAbaby, Treace Medical Concepts), and automotive/electronics clients such as AutoConnect Holdings. Her published practice description (IPWatchdog) likewise describes a litigation background focused on software and electronics.
On side preference, the tracked docket is 23 plaintiff-side to 1 defendant-side, but the labels require a caveat: nearly all of her appearances are as petitioner in PTAB proceedings filed by Unified Patents, not as a patent owner enforcing rights. Unified is a member-funded defensive aggregator that files IPRs and PGRs to invalidate patents asserted against its members, so this is best characterized as repeat-challenger/defensive work against NPE-held patents rather than plaintiff-side patent prosecution for a PAE. The single defendant-side entry is a litigation caption, not a shift in practice posture. She does not appear to represent operating companies as defense counsel in district court matters.
Her firm context is Unified Patents itself — she acts as in-house counsel, regularly appearing on Unified's petitions alongside outside firms such as Erise IP, Haynes and Boone, and Baker Botts. She previously was a litigator and associate at Erise IP, P.A. (Greenwood Village, Colorado), where she worked on patent litigation and PTAB matters including the Apple v. Taction Technology proceedings. Notable tracked matters include the multiple Unified challenges to Malikie Innovations Wi-Fi patents (several instituted, per Unified's own insights posts), Unified v. Monahan Products (UPPAbaby), Unified v. Treace Medical Concepts, the Realtime Data and RazDog Holdings challenges, and the Samsung Display and AutoConnect Holdings matters. Verified outcomes are limited to institution decisions and Unified's published results; no jury verdicts or Federal Circuit decisions attributable to her were identified in public sources.
PTAB/IPR experience is the core of her practice, and she is a frequent panelist in Unified's filings — e.g., the Lab Technology audio-announcement challenge, the Monticello Enterprises payment patent challenge, and the SVV Technology display challenges — where she is credited as in-house counsel alongside outside counsel. She also writes the periodic "Patent Filings Roundup" for IPWatchdog covering PTAB and district court filing trends. She is registered to practice before the USPTO (Reg. No. 76,593) and earned her J.D. at the University of Colorado. Sources do not reliably confirm state bar admissions, so that detail is omitted.
Firms
Roles
- in-house8
- Senior Patent Counsel5
- in-house counsel3
- In-house Counsel3
- In-house counsel2
- Senior Patent Counsel, In-House1
- Senior Patent Counsel, in-house1
- Senior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents1
Cases (24)
- π plaintiffUnified Patents Inc. v. Owner of US7704721Unified Patents Inc. · in-house counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents LLC v. AuthWallet LLCin-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents LLC v. Monticello Enterprises LLCUnified Patents LLC · In-house counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents LLC v. Power2B Inc.in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents LLC v. Realtime Data LLCin-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents LLC v. RFCyber CorpUnified Patents · in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Advanced Integrated Circuit Process LLCUnified Patents · in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. AutoConnect Holdings LLCin-house counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Damaka IncUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel, in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. JLI National Settlement TrustSenior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Malikie Innovations LtdIn-house Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Malikie Innovations Ltd.Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Marlin Semiconductor LtdUnified Patents · in-house counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Marlin Semiconductor Ltd.Unified Patents · In-house counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Monahan Products, LLC D/B/A/ UPPABABY et al.Unified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. RFCyber CorpUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.In-house Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Treace Medical Concepts Inc.Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents, LLC v. Razdog Holdings LLCIn-house Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseSenior Patent Counsel, In-House
- π plaintiffUntitled caseUnified Patents · in-house
- π plaintiffUntitled casein-house
- π plaintiffUntitled caseUnified Patents Inc. · in-house
- Δ defendantUntitled caseSenior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents