Patent litigation attorney
Jordan Rossen
38 tracked appearances — 35 plaintiff · 3 defendant.
Specialty & background
Jordan Rossen is a Senior Patent Counsel at Unified Patents, where he specializes in intellectual property litigation, particularly focusing on challenging the validity of patents asserted by Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs). His practice spans a diverse array of technology areas, including computer hardware and software, data processing, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, material science, energy and geosciences, insurance, banking, vehicle telematics, semiconductors, and plastics.
Rossen's litigation profile strongly favors the petitioner side, with 29 of his 31 tracked appearances originating from his role with Unified Patents, an organization dedicated to deterring patent assertion entities through various strategies, including inter partes reviews (IPRs). His work involves initiating actions to invalidate patents, and he has also represented Unified Patents as a defendant in two tracked cases.
Prior to his in-house role at Unified Patents, Rossen gained extensive experience in intellectual property litigation, having practiced for eleven years in the intellectual property litigation departments of Ropes & Gray and Paul Hastings in Washington, D.C. At Unified Patents, he is instrumental in preparing and litigating post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). His firm, Unified Patents, has maintained a 100% success rate in defending its Real Party-in-Interest (RPI) status across more than 300 PTAB proceedings over the past decade.
His significant PTAB experience includes cases such as Unified Patents, LLC v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC, where all challenged claims of U.S. Patent 9,291,475 were found unpatentable. He has also been involved in ex parte reexaminations resulting in findings of substantial new questions of patentability against patents owned by Intellectual Ventures. Rossen is a recognized voice on PTAB issues, having co-authored alerts on USPTO rule amendments for PTAB trials and participating in webinars discussing the evolving PTAB landscape.
Rossen earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. He is also a registered patent attorney with the USPTO (Reg. No. 74,064) and has been recognized in Washington D.C. Super Lawyers Rising Stars.
Firms
Roles
- Senior Patent Counsel17
- in-house10
- Senior Patent Counsel (in-house)3
- in-house counsel2
- Senior Patent Counsel, in-house2
- Senior Patent Counsel, In-House1
- in-house senior patent counsel1
- Senior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents1
- In-house Counsel1
Cases (38)
- Δ defendantDigital Verification Systems LLC v. Unified Patents, Inc.in-house senior patent counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents Inc. v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals LtdUnified Patents · in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents Inc. v. Owner of US7704721Unified Patents Inc. · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents LLC v. AuthWallet LLCin-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents LLC v. RFCyber CorpUnified Patents · in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents LLC v. Smart Speaker LLCUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents PTAB Data v. Perceptive Automata LLCUnified Patents · in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. CardWare Inc. et al.Senior Patent Counsel (in-house)
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Carma Technology LtdSenior Patent Counsel (in-house)
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Damaka IncUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel, in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. JLI National Settlement TrustSenior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Longhorn Automotive Group LLCin-house counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Malikie Innovations LtdSenior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Malikie Innovations Ltd.Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Marlin Semiconductor LtdUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Monahan Products, LLC D/B/A/ UPPABABY et al.Unified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Moskowitz Family LLCUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel, in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Nielsen Co US LLCUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel (in-house)
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLCUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. RFCyber CorpUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Rideshare Displays Inc.In-house Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.Unified Patents · in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. SIMPLYTAPP Inc. et al.Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Tempus AI IncSenior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. TOUTVIRTUAL IncUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Treace Medical Concepts Inc.Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents, LLC v. Bulletproof Property Management LLCin-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents, LLC v. Dynapass Holdings IP LLCUnified Patents · in-house
- π plaintiffUnified Patents, LLC v. Veroscan Inc.in-house counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseSenior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseSenior Patent Counsel, In-House
- π plaintiffUntitled caseUnified Patents · in-house
- π plaintiffUntitled casein-house
- π plaintiffUntitled caseSenior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseUnified Patents · Senior Patent Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseUnified Patents Inc. · in-house
- Δ defendantUntitled caseSenior Patent Counsel, Unified Patents
- Δ defendantVIDEOLABS Inc. v. Unified PatentsSenior Patent Counsel