Patent litigation attorney
Jenna Fuller
14 tracked appearances — 3 plaintiff · 11 defendant.
Specialty & background
Jenna Fuller is a patent litigation attorney with a practice focused on complex technology, encompassing medical devices, electro-mechanical devices, and computer systems. Her technical background, including degrees in Applied Computer Science and Biology, underpins her work in these sophisticated areas. Fuller's case history primarily involves defending operating companies against allegations of patent infringement, with nine out of her ten tracked appearances being on the defendant side, though her firm's practice also includes representing patent owners.
Fuller is currently with Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer, a firm established in 2025 through the merger of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel and Herbert Smith Freehills. Her prior experience includes roles at both Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel and Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer before the unified branding.
A notable aspect of her practice includes involvement in the long-running patent litigation, Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., where she served as appellate counsel for Centripetal Networks. This case notably resulted in a vacated $1.9 billion district court judgment, with subsequent related Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) challenges. Fuller also has extensive experience in PTAB proceedings, representing clients in inter partes reviews (IPRs) against entities such as Unified Patents and defending Centripetal Networks' patents against challenges from Cisco Systems, Inc. and Keysight Technologies. She is recognized for her PTAB work and is a member of the PTAB Bar Association.
Fuller is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia (2024) and California (2018), and is registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2015). She earned her J.D. from the University of New Hampshire School of Law in 2018, following undergraduate studies in Applied Computer Science at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and Biology at the University of St. Thomas. During law school, she gained appellate experience as an extern for the Honorable Pauline Newman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Firms
Roles
- Counsel3
- Backup Counsel3
- Respondent Counsel1
- backup counsel1
- appellate counsel1
- counsel1
- Lead Counsel1
- Counsel for Patent Owner1
- Attorney for Patent Owner1
Cases (14)
- π plaintiffCentripetal Networks, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) · appellate counsel
- π plaintiffCentripetal Networks, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer · Counsel for Patent Owner
- Δ defendantCisco Systems, Inc. v. Centripetal Networks, Inc.Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer · Counsel
- Δ defendantKeysight Technologies, Inc. v. Centripetal Networks, Inc.Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
- Δ defendantNot yet publicly available v. W&wsens Devices Inc.Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel · Counsel
- Δ defendantPalo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Centripetal Networks, Inc.Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer · counsel
- Δ defendantResmed Corp. v. Cleveland Medical Devices Inc.Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) · Attorney for Patent Owner
- Δ defendantResmed Corp. v. Cleveland Medical Devices Inc.Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) · Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. [Patent Owner]Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) · backup counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Cleveland Medical Devices IncHerbert Smith Freehills Kramer · Respondent Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. TOUTVIRTUAL IncHerbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) · Backup Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. TOUTVIRTUAL IncHerbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) · Backup Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. TOUTVIRTUAL Inc.Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) · Backup Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseHerbert Smith Freehills Kramer · Lead Counsel