Jeffrey Cohen

I'll research this attorney, starting with the tracked case and firm context.

Let me verify the specific role in the EagleView case and check for PTAB/IPR activity.

Let me pin down which side Flaster Greenberg represented and check for any additional docket detail.

Jeffrey A. Cohen — patent litigation summary

Specialty / focus areas. Cohen is primarily a commercial and intellectual-property litigator at Flaster Greenberg PC, not a full-time patent specialist. His documented patent work is concentrated in pharmaceutical Hatch-Waxman/ANDA litigation — he lists In re Desloratadine Patent Litigation (MDL 1851), Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Sandoz (aripiprazole), Sanofi-Aventis U.S. v. Sandoz (oxaliplatin), Sepracor v. Teva (eszopiclone) and In re Armodafinil Patent Litigation, representing the generic/defense side. His single tracked patent case, Eagle View Technologies v. Xactware Solutions, is a software/geospatial imaging dispute (patents covering roof-measurement methods derived from aerial imagery). Firm bios also list trademarks, copyrights and design/architectural copyright work; there is no indication of Wi-Fi/standards-essential or mechanical patent practice.

Side preference. The tracked record is one appearance, entirely on the defendant side, as counsel (0 plaintiff / 1 defendant). That is consistent with his documented patent work, which is defense-oriented (generic pharmaceutical manufacturers in ANDA suits and a defendant in the EagleView case). He is not an NPE/PAE-side filer on the record, though he does bring affirmative IP claims for clients on the copyright/trademark side (e.g., a jewelry-design copyright suit reported at roughly $1 million).

Firm context and notable matters. Cohen has been at Flaster Greenberg PC since 2001, where he chairs the Litigation Department, sits on the Board of Directors, is a member of the Intellectual Property Department, chairs the firm's Pharmaceutical Industry Group and leads its Sports Law Industry Group. Before that he was at Duane Morris LLP (1997–2001) and Rubinate & Jacobs (1994–1997), and served as in-house counsel at two national insurance companies. The tracked matter, Eagle View Technologies, Inc. et al. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc. et al. (D.N.J. No. 1:15-cv-07025), is a lengthy aerial-rooftop-imaging patent fight: the jury found willful infringement and awarded EagleView $125 million in lost profits (Sept. 2019), followed by a permanent injunction and a Federal Circuit affirmance of the PTAB's validity findings (Xactware Solutions v. Eagle View, Nos. 2018-1053 et al., Mar. 6, 2019, nonprecedential). The parties settled in November 2021 and dismissed the appeal; in January 2022 Judge Renée Marie Bumb vacated the permanent injunction but refused the parties' joint request to vacate the judgment. Flaster Greenberg's signature (Jeffrey A. Cohen and Krishna A. Jani) appears in the 2021–22 post-trial filings on the defense side, succeeding earlier local defense counsel.

PTAB / IPR, bar and education. I found no verified individual IPR/PGR appearances by Cohen; he authored a 2016 firm client alert on Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. Lee discussing PTAB inter partes review procedure, and Flaster Greenberg's patent group touts IPR/PGR capability, but his personal PTAB track record should not be assumed from that. Bar admissions: Pennsylvania (1993), New York (2000), New Jersey (2002), with admissions before the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and Third Circuit. Education: J.D., University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1993); B.A., University of Michigan (1990).

Disambiguation note: several attorneys share this name (including a Northern Virginia patent attorney, "Jeffrey R. Cohen," and a Los Angeles business litigator, "Jeffrey A. Cohen"). The tracked appearance and the background above correspond to Jeffrey A. Cohen of Flaster Greenberg (Cherry Hill, NJ / Philadelphia). One caveat: the docket signature blocks in the EagleView case are two-column filings, and the extracted text is ambiguous as to which caption each firm signed under; the tracked data classifies his role as defendant-side counsel, and that is how it is presented here.