Jaspreet K. Momi

I'll research this attorney before drafting.

Let me try more targeted searches.

Let me dig further on firm affiliation and specific cases.

Note on sourcing: Public information specifically identifying Jaspreet K. Momi's patent practice is thin — the searches returned no firm bio page, court opinion, or Law360/Reuters attorney profile for this name in a patent litigation context. The summary below rests primarily on the authoritative case list, with firm-level case reporting used only where clearly attributable.

Specialty / focus areas. All three tracked matters cluster around a single patent portfolio — Maxell's consumer-electronics patents. The asserted technology spans mobile and personal electronic devices (the Maxell v. Samsung case was described in firm reporting as covering device-unlocking methods, recording-location, and digital data management, with parallel Maxell campaigns involving smart TVs, smart appliances, and media/display features). The tracked docket set therefore reads as standard-essential/consumer-electronics patent litigation, with one wireless-device dispute (Motorola Mobility v. Maxell) and one PTAB challenge (Unified Patents v. Maxell Ltd.). There is no public indication of a pharma, chemical, or mechanical practice for this attorney.

Side preference. The structured counts show 1 plaintiff-side and 2 defendant-side appearances, but the more useful pattern is client-driven rather than side-driven: every tracked matter appears to be work for Maxell. In Maxell, Ltd. v. Samsung, Maxell was the plaintiff asserting patents; in Motorola Mobility LLC v. Maxell and Unified Patents v. Maxell Ltd., Maxell was the responding party. That profile fits a patent-owner/monetization practice — representing one portfolio holder across affirmative assertions and defensive challenges — rather than either a pure operating-company defense practice or a broad NPE-side prosecution practice across many clients.

Firm context. Mayer Brown is the sole firm listed across all three appearances, with roles recorded as "patent owner attorney," "counsel," and "Patent Owner Attorney." I could not verify any prior firm affiliation in a patent capacity. A "Jaspreet Momi" appears as a 2023 summer associate at Sterne Kessler co-authoring a trademark/branding article (INFORM Act) — that is a possible but unconfirmed match and should be verified before relying on it.

Notable cases / outcomes. The most prominent tracked matter is Maxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., in which the Mayer Brown team obtained a $111.7 million jury verdict in the Eastern District of Texas in May 2025 on three patents, with findings of willfulness and rejection of Samsung's invalidity case on two patents; a Federal Circuit appeal (No. 2026-1625) is recorded. The published team roster for that trial lists a large group led by partner Jamie Beaber and does not name Momi, so her individual contribution to the verdict is not publicly confirmed. She also appears in the Motorola Mobility v. Maxell district court action and the Unified Patents challenge.

PTAB / IPR experience. The Unified Patents v. Maxell Ltd. appearance — with the role designation "Patent Owner Attorney" — indicates PTAB experience on the patent-owner side, though the number of proceedings is small and no separate IPR docket for this attorney surfaced publicly.

Bar / education. Not reliably sourced; omitted rather than guessed.