Bryon T. Wasserman

Specialty / focus. Bryon T. Wasserman is an IP litigator whose docket spans computer software and hardware, consumer electronics, telecommunications, e-commerce, network security, semiconductors, and medical devices (per his Radulescu LLP bio). His physics background (B.S., Ohio State) fits his heavy involvement in LED/semiconductor disputes — e.g., the Seoul Semiconductor/Seoul Viosys LED litigation and the Jesco/AGS linear-LED lighting matter — plus earlier work on LCD fabrication, embedded wireless modules, and wireless medical devices.

Side preference. The tracked record shows one plaintiff-side appearance (Jesco Lighting Group v. AGS Lighting Management, LLC, Radulescu LLP, Of Counsel) and zero defendant-side appearances, reflecting that his current practice at Radulescu is primarily patent-owner/enforcement-side. That said, he has historically worked both sides: at Mayer Brown he defended operating companies (e.g., Philips, Gemalto, Cinterion) and appeared for petitioner LG in an IPR, and at Radulescu he has also appeared for accused infringers (e.g., as pro hac vice counsel for defendant Jesco Lighting in the parallel Delaware action AGS Lighting Mgmt. v. Jesco Lighting Group, No. 1:25-cv-00141).

Firm context. Wasserman is Of Counsel at Radulescu LLP (New York), the boutique IP litigation firm run by David Radulescu. Prior stops: Mayer Brown LLP (associate 2011, counsel 2012–2016), Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel (counsel 2016–2017), and Ice Miller LLP (of counsel 2017–2021). He is not in-house.

Notable cases / outcomes.

• DSS, Inc. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Fed. Cir. No. 22-1372 (appeal of IPR2020-00938): represented appellee Seoul Semiconductor; the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB in Seoul Semiconductor's favor by Rule 36 judgment (April 5, 2024).
• Seoul Semiconductor / Seoul Viosys v. FEIT Electric (C.D. Cal.) and Seoul Semiconductor v. GE Healthcare (D. Del.): LED-patent enforcement work as part of the Radulescu team.
• Earlier highlights (firm bio): early stipulation of non-infringement for Cinterion in M2M Solutions v. Cinterion Wireless after favorable claim construction; successful reexamination defense and settlement in Regalo Int'l v. Summer Infant; and defense of Philips entities in the Body Science MDL, iLife Technologies v. Lifeline, and an ITC Blu-ray investigation.
• Related to the tracked case, Radulescu LLP represents Jesco Lighting as petitioner in IPR2025-01328 against AGS Lighting Management (instituted January 16, 2026).

PTAB / IPR experience. Yes — he appears regularly in IPR proceedings on both sides: petitioner-side counsel for LG in IPR2015-00324; back-up counsel for patent owner Sensor Electronic Technology in IPR2022-00780/-00781 (settled); appellee-side in the DSS Federal Circuit appeal of an IPR; and in the instituted Jesco/AGS IPR.

Bar / education. Admitted in California (2001), D.C. (2006), Pennsylvania (2016), and New York (2021); registered with the USPTO and admitted to the Federal Circuit. J.D., Georgetown University Law Center (2001); B.S. Physics, Ohio State University (1998).

Sources: Radulescu LLP attorney bio (radip.com); Federal Circuit judgment and mandate in DSS, Inc. v. Seoul Semiconductor (CAFC, Apr. 5, 2024); PTAB filings in IPR2015-00324, IPR2020-00938, IPR2022-00780, and IPR2025-01328; Unicourt/Justia dockets for the AGS/Jesco Delaware action; Law360 and Panitch Schwarze announcements.