Counsel registry

Tadlock Law Firm

1 case appearance 1 as plaintiff counsel · 0 as defendant counsel.

Firm overview

Tadlock Law Firm's patent litigation practice, as evidenced by available public records, primarily centers on its involvement in specific patent infringement disputes. A comprehensive public profile detailing the firm's full office footprint, overall size, or specific AmLaw/Chambers rankings for a patent litigation practice is not readily discoverable. Public search results for "Tadlock Law Firm" largely point to firms specializing in family law or business and real estate law in North Texas, with different key attorneys, suggesting that the patent litigation entity may be a distinct or highly specialized practice not extensively profiled.

In its sole tracked appearance, Tadlock Law Firm represented the plaintiff side in the patent infringement case eDekka LLC v. 3Balls.com, Inc. The firm's involvement in this case indicates a focus, at least in this instance, on representing patent holders. The technology area implicated in this case involved U.S. Patent No. 6,266,674, pertaining to "Random access information retrieval utilizing user-defined labels," which was alleged to cover online shopping cart technology.

A prominent case outcome associated with the firm's tracked activity is eDekka LLC v. 3Balls.com, Inc. In this matter, the Eastern District of Texas Judge Rodney Gilstrap ruled against the plaintiff, eDekka LLC, invalidating the patent in question. The decision led to the dismissal of 168 related patent infringement suits filed by eDekka, a prolific plaintiff often characterized as a "patent troll." The court found that the patent claimed an abstract idea and lacked an inventive concept, and subsequently invited defendants to submit briefing regarding the recovery of attorney's fees.

There is no publicly available information to indicate that Tadlock Law Firm maintains a notable practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) or engages significantly in Inter Partes Review (IPR) or Post-Grant Review (PGR) proceedings. Key attorneys listed as counsel for the firm in the eDekka case include Charles Craig Tadlock, Keith Bryan Smiley, and John J. Harvey, Jr.

Attorneys

Roles

  • counsel3

Cases (1)