IHatePatent Trolls
Patents
Litigations
Representatives
PTAB
Resources
SearchAdmin
  1. Home
  2. /Representatives
  3. /Knobbe Martens

Counsel registry

Knobbe Martens

9 case appearances — 4 as plaintiff counsel · 5 as defendant counsel.

Attorneys

  • William R. Zimmerman2
  • Sean Michael Murray1
  • Karen M. Cassidy1
  • Ali S. Razai1
  • Ashley C. Morales1
  • Craig Steven Summers1
  • Salima Merani1
  • Sabrina C. O'Farrell1
  • Carol Pitzel Cruz1
  • Jared C. Bunker1

Roles

  • counsel8
  • lead counsel6
  • key counsel2
  • back-up counsel2
  • associate counsel1
  • pro hac vice1
  • appearing attorney1
  • attorney1
  • Lead Counsel1

Cases (9)

  • π plaintiffAvidbots Corporation v. Brain CorporationMauricio Uribe · pro hac vice
  • π plaintiffEdge Systems LLC v. Cartessa Aesthetics, LLCSean Michael Murray · counsel
  • π plaintiffHydraFacial LLC v. Sinclair Pharma Limited et al.Salima Merani
  • Δ defendantInternational Business Machines Corp. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLCBrenton R. Babcock · lead counsel
  • Δ defendantLifeNet Health v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. et al.William R. Zimmerman · Lead Counsel
  • Δ defendantOtsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Lupin Ltd. et al.William R. Zimmerman · lead counsel
  • Δ defendantShanghai Jinko Green Energy Enterprise Management Co LTD et al. v. Waaree Energies Limited et al.Brian C. Horne · counsel
  • π plaintiffUntitled caseJared Bunker · attorney
  • Δ defendantUntitled caseJoseph R. Re · lead counsel

Further reading

  • The Patent Scam (2017): a documentary on the patent troll industry

    Most people learn about patent trolls only when they get sued by one. The Patent Scam does the work of making the problem concrete before that happens.

  • How to respond to a patent troll demand letter

    Trolls don't write demand letters expecting a fight. The right response makes you the wrong target.

  • Patent trolls in 2025: the year in numbers

    2025 was a banner year for patent trolls — and not by accident. Filings surged while the defendant's cheapest weapon, the PTAB, was quietly taken off the table. Here's what the reporting shows, and why the two are connected.

  • Joint defense groups: economics, formation, and the privilege framework

    An NPE sues twenty defendants on one patent. Solo, each faces $3-5M in defense costs. Pooled into a joint defense group, the per-defendant number drops to $200-500K. The economics only work if the privilege framework is set up correctly.

  • Declaratory judgment actions: when to flip the table on a patent troll

    The patent holder is the one with the patent. They're not always the one who gets to pick the courtroom.

All resources →

Test yourself

How well do you actually know patent law?

Ten multiple-choice questions, about 3 minutes. Covers § 101, § 102, § 103, IPR, claim construction, and the landmark cases. Anonymous, no sign-up. The per-question accuracy data behind the scenes identifies the doctrines defendants get wrong most often — see if you do better than average.

Take the quiz→
IHatePatent Trolls

An open defense for patent defendants. AI-generated invalidity dossiers and a public litigation database — so the next defendant doesn’t have to start from scratch.

HomePatentsLitigationsAssertersCorrespondentsResourcesQuizAboutContactPrivacyAdmin

Not legal advice

All content on this site — including patent summaries, prior-art and obviousness analyses, derivative works, litigation summaries, and any sample response letters — is generated by AI, may contain errors or omissions, and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing on this site is legal advice and nothing here creates an attorney-client relationship. Do not rely on this content to make legal decisions, respond to demand letters, or take any action in pending or threatened litigation. Consult a licensed patent attorney before acting.

Not every patent holder is a “troll”

Not all companies that litigate their patents are patent trolls. A patent troll — technically a Non-Practicing Entity (NPE), sometimes called a Patent Assertion Entity (PAE) — is a person or entity that acquires patents (often broad or vague ones) not to produce goods, but to extort licensing fees or settlements from companies through threats of infringement litigation. Many patent owners enforce their patents legitimately to protect real products, technologies, and research investments they have actually made. The analyses on this site are tools for evaluating any patent assertion on its merits — not blanket accusations against every patentee.

IHatePatentTrolls is a TheDataProject.AI platform. Patent data sourced from public records and user contributions.

© 2026 oconnorventures.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved.