Counsel registry

Budo Law

5 case appearances — 5 as plaintiff counsel · 0 as defendant counsel.

Firm overview

Firm overview. Budo Law is a micro-boutique patent litigation firm founded in August 2019 by Kirk J. Anderson and based in Arvada, Colorado (5610 Ward Rd., Suite #300). Filings show the firm operating as both "BUDO LAW, LLP" and "BUDO LAW P.C.," with a small team led by Anderson and Mark Rabideau (both University of Virginia Law alumni). It is not ranked by AmLaw or Chambers and publishes no revenue or headcount data we could verify; by all indications it is a regional patent shop, not a BigLaw or mid-market firm. The firm's own profile describes its focus as "helping inventors and patent owners protect their valuable patent rights" with experience before district courts and the Federal Circuit (UpCounsel profile; RPX Insight litigation documents).

IP litigation specialty. The firm describes a generalist patent-enforcement practice (utility, design, infringement and validity work), with Anderson's personal background in software development and Linux administration. The tracked docket is concentrated in software/navigation technology: all five tracked appearances are suits brought for Context Directions LLC, a patent-assertion entity that Stanford's NPE Litigation Database lists as asserting acquired patents. Public sources also show the firm handling E.D. Tex. litigation for Zeppelin Corporation over U.S. Patent No. 10,313,630 (a phone with fluorescent materials). No pharma, semiconductor, or mechanical portfolio appears in verifiable records.

Side preference. Budo Law is strictly plaintiff-side in the tracked data: 5 of 5 appearances as lead counsel for plaintiffs, 0 for defendants. The firm's clientele skews to patent owners and assertion entities — Context Directions LLC is classified as an NPE by Stanford's database — rather than operating-company defense. There is no verifiable record of the firm defending infringement suits or handling Hatch-Waxman/ANDA work.

Notable cases. The firm's most prominent matters are the Context Directions LLC suits against Garmin International, Avis Budget Group, Ean Holdings (Enterprise Holdings), and Fossil Group. In Context Directions LLC v. Garmin International, Inc. (C.D. Cal. No. 2:22-cv-01360), the firm sued over U.S. Patent No. 11,057,738 in February 2022; Garmin answered with counterclaims, but Context Directions voluntarily dismissed the case with prejudice in May 2022 — a result consistent with settlement, though no terms are public. Early dismissal of Garmin Ltd. without prejudice also occurred. No verdicts or Federal Circuit opinions involving the firm could be verified in public sources.

PTAB / IPR practice; key partners. No credible evidence of a notable IPR/PGR filing or defense practice exists; the firm's publicly visible work is district-court patent enforcement, so any PTAB volume should be presumed minimal unless documented. Practice leadership is Kirk J. Anderson (founder; CA-bar; appears as lead counsel in all five tracked cases) and Mark Rabideau; no other partners are reliably identified. Rankings, headcount, and revenue figures should not be inferred, as none are publicly sourced.

Attorneys

Roles

  • lead counsel5

Cases (5)