Invalidity dossier

US 9847083

System and method for voice actuated configuration of a controlling device

Current assignee: Universal Electronics Inc

Added 10/9/2026, 12:01:28 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US9847083B2

Title: "System and method for voice actuated configuration of a controlling device"

Assignee: Universal Electronics Inc. (original assignee; an assignment recorded 2011-11-17 from inventor Jonathan Lim).

Inventor: Jonathan Lim.

Key dates: Priority date and filing date both 2011-11-17 (application US13/298,629). Published as US20130132094A1 on 2013-05-23; granted as US9847083B2 on 2017-12-19. Listed legal status: Active, with an adjusted expiration of 2032-08-02.

Purpose and plain-language scope: The patent concerns configuring a "controlling device" — in context, a remote control — using voice. The prior-art keywords listed in the source ("controlling device," "codeset," "provisioned," "command," "recited") indicate the subject matter centers on provisioning and selecting codesets for a controlling device, with voice-recited input playing a role in that configuration. In plain terms: rather than manually entering a setup code to program a remote, a user speaks, and the system uses that speech in configuring the device. The technical classifications place it in speech recognition (G10L15/22, G10L2015/025 — man-machine dialogue and phoneme recognition units), wireless control-signal transmission/programming of remote controls (G08C17/00; G08C2201/20–21, 2201/30–31 — binding/programming of remote controls, third-means programming, and voice input user interface), and interactive television client/remote-control peripherals (H04N21/422 and subclasses, including reprogrammable remote controls and remote-control emulation). Family members listed include EP2780908B1, BR112014010748B1, WO2013074253A1, and CN103959374B; later filings claim priority to this patent (US11264018B2, US11996100B2, US20240282307A1).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US9847083](/patent/US9847083)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is largely bibliographic and classification data. It does not reproduce the claims, the written description, the drawings, or the abstract, so the precise claimed scope cannot be stated with confidence — the scope description above is inferred from classifications and prior-art keywords only. It also does not establish the identity of cited prior art or the substance of any legal proceedings referenced in the metadata; per the source, the status and priority-date entries are themselves assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Generated 10/10/2026, 12:00:56 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9847083. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.