Invalidity dossier

US 8903067

Apparatus and method for automatically refreshing a display of a telephone

Current assignee: Lab Technology LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 9:13:19 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US8903067B2

Title: Apparatus and method for automatically refreshing a display of a telephone

Patent number / application: US8903067B2; application US11/472,613

Assignee (per source): Original assignee TP Lab Inc. The source lists current assignee as Lab Technology LLC (noted as possibly inaccurate). Per instructions, ownership transfers are not addressed here.

Key dates (as listed): Prior art date and filing date 2006-06-22; publication date 2014-12-02; adjusted expiration 2031-07-23; legal status listed as Active. The source notes that legal status and dates are assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Inventor: Shin Cheung Simon Chiu

Purpose: The invention "relates generally to telecommunications, and more specifically to apparatus and methods for automatically refreshing a display screen of a telephone." The stated problem is that a telephone's display and navigation keys force users to "navigate through many menu displays in order to find a desired service," given the many available services (personal communication, directory, information, and commercial services such as voice messaging, yellow pages, stock quotes, weather, traffic, fund transfer, ticketing, or merchandise ordering).

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): The patent addresses automatically refreshing a telephone's display so that the services shown reflect what the user is likely to want. The excerpt indicates the refresh can depend on usage patterns — users "often access the same services at the same time every day," use some services more routinely, and may access certain services "depending on their location," such as on public transportation or in a mall. A worked example describes a working single parent using a home phone for weather, traffic, school announcements, voice messages, and news, and a local restaurant directory to order take-out. Classifications include location-based services (H04W4/02, H04W4/029) and user interfaces adapted to specific conditions according to geographic location (H04M1/72457).

Not established by the excerpt: The excerpt omits the claims, abstract, and most of the description. It therefore does not establish the specific claimed apparatus/method steps, the exact refresh triggers or algorithms, claim scope or breadth, validity, or the prior art. The source URL is https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8903067](/patent/US8903067)/en.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:40:52 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8903067. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.