Invalidity dossier

US 8145578

Aerial roof estimation system and method

Current assignee: EagleView Technologies Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 11:41:18 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US8145578B2

Title: Aerial roof estimation system and method

Patent number / application: US8145578B2; Application US12/148,439

Inventors: Chris Pershing, Dave Carlson

Assignee: Original assignee recorded as "Eagel View Tech Inc" (later reassigned to Eagle View Technologies, Inc.); current assignee listed as EagleView Technologies Inc.

Key dates: Prior art date 2007-04-17 (priority); filing date 2008-04-17; publication date 2012-03-27; legal status listed as Active with adjusted expiration 2029-12-02. Classifications include G06Q30/02, G06Q30/0283, G06Q40/08 (insurance), and G06Q50/16 (real estate).

Purpose: The patent addresses a practical problem in construction estimating: producing timely written roofing estimates normally requires a contractor to physically visit a building to determine roof style, take measurements, and inspect access and cleanup conditions. Travel time, commuting cost, weather, and traffic can make this prohibitive, especially for small contractors or distant jobs. The stated need is a system that lets a roof be measured quickly and easily without requiring the estimator to travel to the building, so the measurements can support an estimate to repair or replace the roof or install equipment on it.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied excerpt): The system uses a roof estimating software program together with a location-linked image file database. A user inputs the building's physical address or location information; the program then presents aerial images of the roof sections at that address. Aerial images may come from an overhead aircraft, a balloon, or a satellite. Image analysis and calibration are then performed either manually or via software, yielding roof measurements usable for an estimate.

Not established by this excerpt: The full claim set and their exact scope; the complete detailed description; the identity and content of prior-art references; and any findings about validity, enforceability, or litigation. The excerpt also does not establish that the listed classifications describe the claims, and it truncates the description mid-sentence ("either manually or via a software pr…").

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8145578](/patent/US8145578)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:29 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8145578. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.