Invalidity dossier

US 7976196

Method of forming LED-based light and resulting LED-based light

Current assignee: Ilumisys Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 12:09:32 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,976,196 B2

Title: Method of forming LED-based light and resulting LED-based light

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7976196/en

Bibliographic data (as listed): Application US12/169,918; priority/filing date 2008-07-09; publication date 2011-07-12; inventors John Ivey and David L. Simon; original assignee Altair Engineering Inc.; current assignee listed as Ilumisys Inc. Legal status listed as active, with adjusted expiration 2029-02-24. A later PCT filing (PCT/US2009/048623) and later US continuations (US13/153,818; US13/602,953) are also noted in the family data. Classification includes F21K9/27 (retrofit light sources substituting for fluorescent tubes), F21K9/90 (methods of manufacture), and various F21V29/xx heat-sink subclasses.

Purpose. The patent addresses LED-based tube lights intended as one-for-one replacements for conventional fluorescent tube lights. Conventional fluorescent tubes present disposal problems due to toxic materials in the glass tube, and LEDs generate heat during operation that is detrimental to their performance. Existing LED tube lights may use heat sinks with projections to increase surface area, formed by extruding aluminum billets through a die.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied text). The described invention provides an LED-based replacement light for a fluorescent fixture that includes a heat sink having a high surface-area-to-width ratio, shaped from a flat sheet of thermally conductive material. Correspondingly, the method includes shaping such a heat sink from a sheet of highly thermally conductive material. The prior-art keywords listed are heat sink, LED/LEDs, light, and "longitudinally extending," and the title indicates both a method of forming the light and the resulting light.

What this excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is explicitly marked as an excerpt with omitted text; it does not include the full claim set, the detailed description, drawing content, or any prior-art references. Because of that, no specific claim limitations, claim counts, or claim scope beyond the quoted phrases can be confirmed, and the classification entries above reflect indexing rather than adjudicated scope. Bibliographic entries are labeled as assumptions by the source itself regarding priority date and legal status. This overview deliberately does not address litigation, assignments beyond those listed, validity, or prior art.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:48 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7976196. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.