Invalidity dossier

US 7810982

Added 9/23/2026, 6:09:21 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US7810982B2

Title: Edge-lit optical system having optical elements on two surfaces

Patent number: US7810982B2 (application US12/364,637)

Inventors: Jeffery R. Parker, Timothy A. McCollum, Robert M. Ezell

Assignee/current assignee (as listed): Rambus Delaware LLC; original assignee Rambus International Ltd.

Key dates: Priority date 1999-02-23 (claimed from US09/256,275); filing date 2009-02-03; publication date 2010-10-12; anticipated expiration 2019-02-23. Legal status listed as "Expired - Fee Related."

Purpose and plain-language scope: The patent concerns an edge-lit optical system in which optical elements are disposed on two surfaces. Classifications place it in lighting refractors (F21V5/00) and light guides, including planar or plate-like light guides, means for coupling light in or out, redirecting means on the light-guide surface, and 2-D arrangements of prisms, protrusions, indentations, or roughened surfaces (G02B6/00–G02B6/0036). The prior-art keywords supplied are "light," "pattern," "optical elements," "optical," and "light source." From the classifications and title alone, the invention appears directed to distributing light in an edge-lit (side-lit) light guide where optical features on two surfaces redirect light, but the excerpt does not supply the claims, so the exact claimed scope is not established here.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7810982](/patent/US7810982)/en

What this excerpt does not establish: It does not include the claims, written description, drawings, or detailed embodiments, so the precise metes and bounds of the invention cannot be stated. It also does not establish the identity or content of cited prior art, the examiner's reasoning, or the scope of any continuations or family members. The listed assignees and legal status are noted by the source as assumptions rather than legal conclusions. No litigation, ownership-transfer validity, patentability, or prior-art analysis is provided or implied here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:59 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7810982. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.