Invalidity dossier

US 7747305

Computer-aided-design of skeletal implants

Current assignee: Osteoplastics LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 11:08:51 PM

IndustryMedical (M)
At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on fileMedical (M)

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US7747305B2 — Patent Overview

Title: Computer-aided-design of skeletal implants
Patent number: US7747305B2
Application number: US11/299,138
Inventors: David Dean, Kyoung-June Min, Robert A. Ratcheson
Original assignee: Case Western Reserve University
Current assignee (as listed): Osteoplastics LLC
Priority date: 2003-06-11
Filing date: 2005-12-09
Publication date: 2010-06-29
Status: Expired – Fee Related; adjusted expiration 2025-08-26
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7747305](/patent/US7747305)/en

Purpose

The patent relates to generating patient-specific, pre-operatively fabricated prosthetic implants, and more particularly to a cranial implant. It addresses a practical problem: cranial defects require well-fitting implants to protect the brain from trauma or infection and to restore aesthetic shape to the head. Where sufficient cranial bone is unavailable for engraftment, malleable biocompatible materials are used instead. The text notes that manual skill required, surgical risk, patient cost, and surgery length all increase with defect size, and that designing and producing a large, well-fitting implant is not trivial even with high-resolution 3D CT as a design basis.

Plain-language scope

The supplied excerpt describes computer-aided design of skeletal implants using geometric modeling concepts. It discusses constructive solid geometry (CSG) and boundary representation (B-rep) as modeling approaches; parametric surfaces including Bezier, B-splines, and NURBS; and the difficulty of directly manipulating 3D parametric surfaces via control points to create complex freeform designs. It also mentions B-spline surface control point schemes derived from previously collected polygonal B-rep models, computationally expensive conversion calculations, and flexible B-spline creation via hierarchical patch refinement and automated conversion. The classifications cover customized prosthesis design using CT/NMR scans and CAD-CAM techniques, cranial/skull prostheses, additive manufacturing, and bone prostheses.

What the excerpt does not establish

The supplied text contains no claim language, no detailed description of method steps or apparatus, no named prior-art references with dates, and no figures or reference numerals. It therefore does not establish the actual claimed scope, the specific clinical workflow, or the full written description. The excerpt also does not address litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art.

Generated 10/15/2026, 11:23:19 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7747305. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Medical (M)

See all Medical (M) patents →