Invalidity dossier

US 7436936

Added 9/23/2026, 1:43:54 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,436,936 B2

Title: VoIP call through tester

Patent number: US 7,436,936 B2

Application number: US 11/064,415

Inventors: Richard D. Terpstra; Thomas S. Traylor; Gregory Keith Brown; John Thomas Ward; Andrew B. Lundgren

Assignee: Level 3 Communications LLC (original assignee Level 3 Communications LLC; an earlier assignment to LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. is recorded, later assigned to LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC)

Priority/filing date: 2005-02-22

Publication date: 2008-10-14

Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime, expires 2026-04-12

Purpose: The patent relates to systems and methods for placing media communications through a network, and more particularly to verifying the routing of a call through a network. It addresses the problem that VoIP network providers often lack efficient means to verify that calls to a block of phone numbers are properly routed to the VoIP network, and must rely on PSTN provider assurances or manually "mine" log files and hand-draw call flows.

Plain-language scope: In described embodiments, an outbound call is generated from a test tool in a first network (e.g., a VoIP network). The outbound call includes a test key and a destination number, with the test key placed in the origination-number field. The call is routed to a second network (e.g., the PSTN) and returns to the first network as an inbound call carrying the test key and destination number. A network resource (such as a softswitch, session border controller, gateway, gateway controller, or proxy/feature server) accesses the test key and, based on it, routes the inbound call to the test tool. Embodiments also collect tracking information (e.g., SS7, IP device control, SIP including signaling latency), may calculate post-dialing delay, and may display a sequence diagram of the tracking information.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7436936/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is explicitly marked as an excerpt with omitted text, so the full claim set and complete specification are not established here. It also does not establish the accuracy of the listed legal status or assignee data, which the source itself describes as assumptions. Claims are paraphrased from the "Definitions" summary section, not verified against the issued claims.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:53 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7436936. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.