Invalidity dossier
US 6678827
Managing multiple network security devices from a manager device
Current assignee: WatchGuard Technologies Inc
Added 9/20/2026, 5:20:10 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US6678827B1
Title: Managing multiple network security devices from a manager device
Patent number / application: US6678827B1; Application US09/307,332
Assignee: WatchGuard Technologies Inc (original and current assignee as listed)
Inventors: Peter M. Rothermel; David Wayne Bonn; Nick T. Marvais
Key dates: Priority date 1999-05-06; filing date 1999-05-06; publication/grant date 2004-01-13; anticipated expiration 2019-05-06 (listed legal status: Expired – Lifetime).
Purpose: The invention "relates generally to communicating information between computers, and more particularly to using a manager device to remotely manage multiple network security devices" (NSDs). NSDs such as firewalls and security appliances monitor network information passing between external devices and a group of trusted/internal devices, implementing a security policy by preventing passage of unauthorized network information. The patent notes that "it can be difficult to configure NSDs so that they correctly implement the desired security policies," citing the large number of network services and protocols (e.g., FTP, HTTP, DNS, SMTP, telnet, and others) and factors such as direction of information flow and sender/recipient identity. An initial incomplete security policy is formed by the types of actions to be taken for monitored network information, and device-specific information — such as the network address of the NSD and network addresses of other devices — must typically be specified to create a specific security policy.
Plain-language scope (from the supplied excerpt): A manager device is used to remotely manage multiple network security devices, addressing the difficulty of configuring NSDs to correctly implement desired security policies, including specifying device-specific information needed for a particular NSD.
Classifications listed: H04L41/00, H04L41/28, H04L41/22, H04L63/00, H04L63/20, H04L9/00, H04L9/40, and configuration-management subclasses.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6678827](/patent/US6678827)/en
What the excerpt does not establish: It does not show the full specification, claims, or figures; the "Definitions" section is truncated mid-sentence ("WAIS (Wide"). It provides no textual support for claim limitations, no description of specific manager-device architecture or data structures, and no cited prior-art references beyond the "Prior art keywords" list. It also does not establish validity, enforceability, claim interpretation, or the legal effect of any listed reassignment or security-agreement entries. Per instructions, no litigation or ownership-transfer analysis is offered.
Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:46 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6678827. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.