Invalidity dossier

US 6104712

Wireless communication network including plural migratory access nodes

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/23/2026, 4:44:31 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,104,712 A

Title: Wireless communication network including plural migratory access nodes

Patent number: US 6,104,712 A
Application number: US 09/253,690
Inventors: Bruno G. Robert; James J. Proto
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee (as listed): Individual
Priority/filing date: 1999-02-22
Publication (grant) date: 2000-08-15
Legal status: Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2019-02-22
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6104712/en

Purpose and plain-language scope (per supplied text)
The patent concerns a wireless communication network that includes multiple "migratory access nodes." The title and indexed prior-art keywords (node, packet, migratory, network, nodes) indicate a packet-based wireless network in which access nodes are not fixed but move within the network. The listing also records an assignment dated 2000-05-19 from James J. Proto to Bruno G. Robert.

Classifications in the supplied text place the subject matter under routing/path finding of packets (H04L45/00), error detection and handling using a return channel (H04L1/00, H04L1/12, H04L1/16), addressing/naming arrangements including non-standard address use (H04L61/00, H04L61/35), wireless traffic and resource management (H04W28/00, H04W28/16, H04W28/18), and wireless routing or path finding based on node resources, antenna characteristics, and transmission power (H04W40/00–H04W40/08). This suggests the claimed subject matter relates to how migrating access nodes are addressed, selected, and used for routing in a wireless packet network.

What the excerpt does not establish
The supplied text is an excerpt: it contains no abstract, no claims, no written description, and no drawing text, so it does not establish the actual claimed scope, claim limitations, or specific embodiments. It does not establish the meaning of "migratory," the number or nature of the nodes, or how migration is implemented. It provides no prior-art references. The listed assignee status is expressly an assumption, not a legal conclusion, and the excerpt contains no information on litigation, ownership transfers beyond the recorded assignment, validity, or enforceability. Dates and classifications are reproduced as listed in the source.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:14 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6104712. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.