Invalidity dossier
US 6011602
Lighting apparatus with a light guiding body having projections in the shape of a trapezoid
Current assignee: BOE Technology Group Co Ltd
Added 9/23/2026, 3:18:54 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US6011602A
Title: Lighting apparatus with a light guiding body having projections in the shape of a trapezoid
Patent number: US6011602A (application US08/860,631)
Original assignee: Seiko Epson Corp. Current assignee listed as BOE Technology Group Co Ltd (the source notes listed assignees may be inaccurate).
Inventors: Satoru Miyashita, Osamu Yokoyama, Tatsuaki Funamoto
Key dates:
- Prior art date / earliest priority: 1995-11-06
- Filing date: 1996-11-06
- Publication (grant): 2000-01-04
- Anticipated expiration: 2016-11-06; legal status listed as "Expired – Lifetime"
Purpose and plain-language scope (from the supplied text):
The patent concerns a lighting apparatus, i.e., a light-guiding body (a plate-like light guide) used to distribute light, typically in a liquid crystal display. The distinguishing feature named in the title is that the light-guiding body has projections shaped like a trapezoid.
The supplied classifications indicate the subject matter: liquid-crystal display construction and structural association with optical devices such as polarizers or reflectors (G02F1/1335); and planar/plate-like light guides with means for improving coupling-out of light, including linear indentations or grooves, prismatic sheets or brightness-enhancement layers, reflecting elements, and polarization effects (G02B6/0011, 6/0033, 6/0035, 6/0038, 6/005, 6/0053, 6/0055, 6/0056). Prior-art keywords listed include "light," "lighting apparatus," "output," "liquid crystal," and "crystal display."
In plain terms, the disclosure appears to cover a lighting apparatus in which light travels through a guiding body and is extracted via trapezoid-shaped projections, with the light output directed toward a liquid crystal display.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6011602](/patent/US6011602)/en
What the excerpt does not establish:
The supplied text contains no claims, no abstract, no detailed description, no drawings, and no cited prior-art references. It therefore does not establish the specific claim language, the exact geometry or dimensions of the trapezoidal projections, the number or arrangement of components, or the technical advantage asserted. It also does not establish inventorship details beyond the three names listed, the basis for the 2016 reassignments, or the accuracy of the listed current assignee.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:51:38 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6011602. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.