Invalidity dossier

US 5982327

Adaptive array method, device, base station and subscriber unit

Current assignee: Google Technology Holdings LLC

Added 9/21/2026, 10:41:27 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,982,327

Title: Adaptive array method, device, base station and subscriber unit

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5982327/en

Bibliographic data (per source): Application US09/005,998; filed 1998-01-12; granted/published 1999-11-09. Inventors Frederick Werner Vook and Kevin Lynn Baum; original assignee Motorola, Inc.; current assignee listed as Google Technology Holdings LLC. Legal status listed as "Expired – Lifetime," with anticipated expiration 2018-01-12. Classifications include H01Q3/2605 (adaptive arrays with feedback control over element weights) and H04B7/0851 (joint weighting using training sequences or error signal).

Purpose: The invention addresses interference suppression in an adaptive antenna array. Prior techniques compute array combining weights from known pilot symbols during a "training interval" and apply them during an "application interval," requiring the channel to stay relatively constant and consuming pilot symbols. The invention is directed to combining signals received from an antenna array so as to track channel variations while minimizing the percentage of the allocated time-frequency spectrum occupied by pilot sequences.

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): The method and device combine antenna signals to suppress interference and improve signal quality measured by bit-error rate (BER) or signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), allowing data reception even with significant interference. It exploits received pilot symbols and permits interference suppression in portions of the spectrum where the transmitter sends no pilots, reducing required pilot overhead. A preferred embodiment operates in an OFDM (multicarrier) system, typically in a low-mobility, delay-spread channel where the channel varies slowly over time but significantly over frequency, such as wireless local loop or fixed access systems. The excerpt lists figures (1–11) covering a device, an antenna combiner and its controller, time-frequency slot structures, and flowcharts of method steps, but reproduces only the description narrative.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full specification, the claims' exact language, the full drawings, detailed algorithms/weight equations, the omitted text after "fed into a...," or the specific content of figures 2–11. It also cannot confirm claim scope, enforceability, or (per instructions) litigation, ownership history, validity, or prior art.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:18 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5982327. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.