Invalidity dossier

US 5956597

Method for producing SOI & non-SOI circuits on a single wafer

Current assignee: Google LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 2:44:57 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 5,956,597

Title: Method for producing SOI & non-SOI circuits on a single wafer

Patent number: US 5,956,597 A

Application number: US 08/929,730

Inventors: Toshiharu Furukawa; Mark C. Hakey; Steven J. Holmes; David V. Horak; Paul A. Rabidoux

Original assignee: International Business Machines Corp. (The source also lists a current assignee of Google LLC, but per instructions I make no representation as to the accuracy of ownership.)

Key dates (as listed): Priority/filing date 1997-09-15; publication/grant 1999-09-21; anticipated expiration 2017-09-15; status listed as "Expired – Lifetime."

Purpose: The patent addresses fabricating integrated circuits, specifically forming Silicon On Insulator (SOI) devices and non-SOI (bulk CMOS) devices on the same wafer. SOI devices offer lower power consumption, lower parasitic capacitance (faster switching), and greater resistance to ionizing radiation, making them popular for memory support and CPU circuits. However, SOI devices have limitations: charges can accumulate during transistor operation, shifting threshold voltage (V_T); the SOI formation process yields more defective circuits than non-SOI processes (defects arising during formation of the electrically insulating region); and some defect-sensitive applications, such as DRAM, do not work well with SOI. The described SOI formation involves heating the wafer to roughly 650–750 °C, implanting large oxygen quantities below the surface, then heating to approximately 1350 °C to react implanted oxide with silicon to produce SiO₂.

Plain-language scope: According to the supplied text, a "stress-reducing region" formed on a wafer allows standard bulk CMOS (non-SOI) devices and SOI devices to be reliably fabricated on the same wafer; the high-stress interface typically existing between SOI and non-SOI regions is transferred to a region where stress is reduced and relaxed. The text also states a coplanar wafer surface can be maintained where a wafer includes both bulk CMOS and SOI devices, and mentions Shallow Trench Isolation (STI) and Chemical Mechanical Polish (CMP). The excerpt includes only the beginning of FIG. 1's description.

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides no claim language, no complete figure descriptions, no detailed process steps/embodiments, no prior-art references, and no examples. Claim scope, limitations, and dependencies therefore cannot be stated.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5956597/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:00 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5956597. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.