Invalidity dossier
US 5619492
CDMA communication system in which bit rates are dynamically allocated
Current assignee: Unisys Corp
Added 9/23/2026, 4:53:31 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 5,619,492 A
Title: CDMA communication system in which bit rates are dynamically allocated
Patent number / application: US 5,619,492 A; application US 08/491,033
Inventors: Harry B. Press; Thomas R. Giallorenzi; Mark T. Rafter
Assignee: Unisys Corporation (original assignee and current assignee as listed)
Key dates: Priority/filing date 1995-06-16 (application filed by Unisys); publication/grant date 1997-04-08; anticipated expiration 2015-06-16. Legal status listed as "Expired – Fee Related." The source notes legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion.
Purpose: The patent addresses drawbacks in multipoint-to-point CDMA systems — specifically, buffer overload at transmitting stations and exceeding total network bit-rate capacity when many stations transmit — by dynamically allocating bit rates.
Plain-language scope: A CDMA system has multiple transmitting stations and one receiving station coupled over a CDMA channel and a feedback channel. Each transmitting station sends control signals at spaced time intervals requesting bit rates; the receiving station's bit-rate allocating circuit responds with feedback messages addressed to individual stations, granting bit rates. Each station receives messages bearing its address and transmits CDMA data at the granted rate. A transmitting station may include a data buffer holding a time-varying number of bytes and request rates based on that number. Stations encode data using a spreading code at a fixed chips-per-second rate and a selectable chips-per-bit count corresponding to the granted rate. The allocating circuit tallies granted bit rates and keeps the tally below a predetermined maximum aggregate bit rate. The specification notes one embodiment uses a pre-existing coaxial cable in a cable television network, with transmitting stations in houses and the receiving station at the cable plant. Figures include formats for CDMA signals and feedback messages, station circuit diagrams, a bit-rate allocation program, and a rate-change timing diagram.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5619492/en
What the excerpt does not establish: The excerpt omits the full description and all claims, so exact claim language, claim count, and specific numerical limits are not established. It does not establish figures or reference numerals, the specific allocation program logic, detailed circuit implementations, or the precise CDMA signal/feedback message formats. It also does not establish examination history, cited references, or the accuracy of the listed legal status, expiration, or assignee data.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:04 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5619492. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.