Invalidity dossier

US 5416842

Added 9/21/2026, 4:02:20 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US5416842A — Method and apparatus for key-management scheme for use with internet protocols at site firewalls

Purpose. The patent addresses key management for encrypting Internet Protocol (IP) data packets between site firewalls, applying the SKIP scheme to secure traffic at the IP layer rather than at the application or transport layers. Encrypting inter-site traffic at the IP layer is said to deny a would-be cracker the ability to detect source and destination addresses of communicating nodes, and because encryption runs only firewall-to-firewall, only the firewall servers need to participate in the SKIP scheme. A further stated requirement accommodated is secure remote-user access to a protected network across the Internet without changes to client applications.

Plain-language scope (as described). A first node (I) on a private network sends a data packet, with IP data and a destination address for node J, to firewall FWA, which is coupled to a public network such as the Internet. FWA holds a secret a and public value α^a mod p; FWB holds secret b and α^b mod p. FWA obtains a Diffie-Hellman (DH) certificate for FWB, determines α^b mod p, computes α^ab mod p, and derives key K_ab. A transient key K_p is generated randomly and configured for use with a predetermined number of packets; K_p encrypts the packet, which FWA encapsulates in a transmission packet bearing an unencrypted destination address for FWB. FWB obtains a DH certificate for FWA, computes α^ab mod p, derives K_ab, and uses it to decrypt K_p. The remote firewall decrypts the encapsulated packet and sends it in the clear to the destination node on its interior side.

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text omits claim language (claims are referenced only in the description/abstract counts), the full specification, drawing contents, and detailed cryptographic parameters. It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art beyond classifications and keyword listings.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:36 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5416842. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.