Invalidity dossier

US 5122464

Method for dominant selection in eucaryotic cells

Current assignee: Lonza Group AG

Added 9/23/2026, 10:02:12 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by Lonza Group AG

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US5122464A

Title: Method for dominant selection in eucaryotic cells

Patent number: US5122464A | Application number: US07/595,733 | Filed: 1987-01-23 | Priority date: 1986-01-23 | Granted/Published: 1992-06-16

Current assignees (as listed, accuracy not represented): University of Glasgow; Celltech R&D Ltd. Original assignees: University of Glasgow; Celltech Ltd. Inventors: Richard H. Wilson; Christopher R. Bebbington. Legal status: Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2009-06-16.

Purpose: The patent concerns selecting genetically transformed eucaryotic (mammalian) host cells. Its stated subject matter centers on glutamine synthetase (GS) as a selectable marker, expression vectors encoding it, and methods of transforming and culturing cells. The abstract is indexed to glutamine and the claims/description to glutamine synthetase, methionine, methionine sulfoximine, and phosphinothricin-type inhibitors.

Plain-language scope: Rather than relying on a drug-resistance marker, the disclosed approach uses a gene encoding glutamine synthetase introduced into a eucaryotic host cell. Cells taking up and expressing the recombinant DNA can be distinguished (dominantly selected) from non-transformed cells, for example by growth conditions or by exposure to an inhibitor of glutamine synthetase such as methionine sulfoximine. The patent text also addresses recombinant DNA, vectors, transcription/regulatory effects, and amplification, and mentions proteins of interest including tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and DHFR in the description. The claims also refer to culturing methods, consistent with use of the selected cells to produce desired protein products.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5122464](/patent/US5122464)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claim language or claim count, a complete specification, exact experimental examples or cell lines, precise vector constructs, or specific sequences. It lists a litigation link and a security-agreement reassignment entry, but provides no litigation substance or ownership analysis; none is assessed here. Expanded-family details, foreign counterparts, and legal effect are likewise not established by this excerpt.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:51 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5122464. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Lonza Group AG

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Lonza Group AG

This patent in court (1)

1 tracked lawsuit name US 5122464.