Invalidity dossier

US 4940116

Unattended checkout system and method

Current assignee: Uniquest Inc

Added 9/24/2026, 12:21:19 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US4940116A — Unattended Checkout System and Method

Title: Unattended checkout system and method
Inventors: David F. O'Connor; Wesley Dickover; Steven J. Tilidetzke
Original assignee: Checkrobot Inc.
Current assignee listing (per source): Uniquest Inc; International Business Machines Corp; NewCheck Corp
Priority/filing date: 1989-03-07 (application US07/320,063)
Publication/grant date: 1990-07-10
Legal status: Expired – Lifetime (per source; source states legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion)

Purpose: The patent concerns operator-unassisted ("self-service") checkout, particularly of bulk articles such as produce that are not prepackaged with supplier-applied UPC indication. Per the excerpt, the customer applies a UPC label to bulk articles upon selection, unlike source-applied UPC on packaged goods.

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): The described system includes a UPC code reader generating an output signal, and storage storing UPC signals of available articles correlated with categories: (1) source-of-manufacture applied UPC, (2) customer-applied UPC with price per unit weight, and (3) customer-applied UPC with price per article unit. Article weight is obtained and multiplied by stored price per unit weight; number of articles purchased is determined and multiplied by stored price per article. Weight and count may be determined by apparatus in the referenced commonly-assigned patents or otherwise. FIG. 1 shows an upper channel configured per those referenced patents and a lower channel per this invention; FIGS. 2 and 3 are flow charts.

The excerpt also describes additional described measures: comparison of stored weight-indicative signals against physically measured weight, with checkout failure and possible conveyor reversal on negative comparison; article-shape detection and comparison; repeat UPC reading in a "security tunnel"; and electronic article surveillance (EAS) tag checking against stored expectations. The excerpt states this invention's primary object is improved systems and methods for operator-unassisted checkout.

Not established by the excerpt: The full claims, the referenced commonly-assigned patents' identities, complete figure details, and omitted specification text. The excerpt is partial and omits portions between "unit 38, wh" and the end. Nothing here establishes validity, litigation, or prior art beyond what the source states.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US4940116](/patent/US4940116)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:31:59 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4940116. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.