Invalidity dossier

US 4936862

Method of designing and manufacturing a human joint prosthesis

Current assignee: Zimmer Technology Inc

Added 9/24/2026, 2:03:40 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US4936862A

Title: Method of designing and manufacturing a human joint prosthesis.

Inventors/Assignee: Peter S. Walker and Frederick C. Ewald; current assignee listed as Zimmer Technology Inc. (original assignee: Individual).

Key dates: Prior art date 1986-05-30; application US07/188,477 filed 1988-04-29; granted and published 1990-06-26; status expired (anticipated expiration 2007-06-26).

Purpose: To develop a method for designing and evaluating a prosthesis combining all significant elements on a given side of a human joint for maximum geometric compatibility with the recipient's supporting bone, enabling press-fit implantation, sufficient stability to induce a stable biologic interface, and maximum bone ingrowth.

Plain-language scope: The method first builds a three-dimensional model of an "average" joint bone, including exterior surfaces and the cortical canal, from a statistically significant sample and a piecewise mathematical analog. Sections may be obtained by slicing embedded cadaver joints into closely spaced segments (e.g., 25) or by CT scan, digitized (e.g., 30–40 points per section), and averaged across corresponding levels. The patient's corresponding bone size and shape is then determined by tomography or radiographs taken in fixed anterior-posterior, lateral-medial, and longitudinal axes. Measured dimensional relationships between the patient's bone and the stored average bone (scaled to the patient) are input to the computer, which generates a three-dimensional shape representing the average bone distorted to conform to the patient's principal contours and dimensions. The resulting design is thus a synthesis of the average bone fitted to the individual, intended to allow anatomic press-fit, optional downsizing for cemented fixation with a uniform mantle relative to cortical bone, and economical customized fit.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US4936862](/patent/US4936862)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It omits much of the specification and all claims; therefore claim scope, claim language, the full manufacturing steps, and the specific figures/embodiments are not established here. Dates and assignee are as listed by the source and are assumptions, not legal conclusions. No litigation, ownership-transfer detail, validity, or prior-art analysis is presented or relied upon.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:30:55 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4936862. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.