Invalidity dossier

US 4751615

Page light

Current assignee: US ACRYLIC Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 4:04:59 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US4751615A — "Page Light"

Bibliographic data (per supplied source):

  • Title: Page light
  • Patent number: US4751615A
  • Application number: US06/893,972
  • Inventor: Martin Abrams
  • Original assignee: International Marketing Concepts, Inc.
  • Priority date / filing date: 1986-08-07
  • Publication (grant) date: 1988-06-14
  • Later recorded assignee: U.S. Acrylic, Inc. (assignment recorded 1989-02-27, per the source's transaction listing)
  • Legal status: Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2006-08-07
  • Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US4751615](/patent/US4751615)/en

Purpose and plain-language scope (based only on the supplied text):
The device is a portable, personal reading/writing light intended to illuminate one or two pages while minimizing light spilling onto adjacent areas. It is a tapered, wedge-shaped transparent body (e.g., acrylic or lucite) with opposed major planar surfaces, side walls, and an end wall. A low-powered bulb sits in a notch/opening at the thicker end; the curved notch wall is described as generally equidistant from the light source to reduce reflection. The tapered body is said to provide controlled, generally uniform illumination of a work surface contacting a major surface—an effect the text says parallel major surfaces would not achieve. The taper (included angle) is stated as somewhat greater than two degrees; example thicknesses are about 375 thousandths of an inch at the thick end and about 60 thousandths at the thin end. Sides are configured/treated to maximize internal reflection and minimize outward transmission. A discontinuity is placed between the light source and the body portion contacting the work surface. The text states the design uses few parts, no moving components, and avoids the roughened-surface approach because scoring would prevent reading through the device.

What the excerpt does not establish:
The supplied text is marked as an excerpt with omitted material, and it includes no claims, no complete drawing descriptions, and no full specification. It therefore does not establish the precise claimed scope, all described embodiments, detailed electrical specifications, or the content of any figures. No conclusions about validity, prior-art effect, or ownership beyond the recorded assignments listed are drawn here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:51:09 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4751615. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.