Invalidity dossier

US 11811582

Cluster computing

Current assignee: Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.

Added 8/27/2026, 4:47:51 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges2 lawsuits on fileasserted by Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US11811582B2 — "Cluster computing"

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US11811582](/patent/US11811582)/en

Bibliographic data (as supplied): Title, "Cluster computing." Current and original assignee, Advanced Cluster Systems Inc. Inventors, Zvi Tannenbaum and Dean E. Dauger. Priority date, 2006-06-13. Filing date, 2023-01-23 (application US18/158,283). Publication date, 2023-11-07. Status, Active; anticipated expiration 2027-05-04. Classifications include G06F9/5072 (grid computing), G06F15/76, G06F9/54, and H04L41/04.

Purpose: The disclosure addresses cluster computing and, in particular, systems and methods for adding cluster computing functionality to a computer program. Many application programs are not designed to benefit from clusters even when running on nodes that could act as one; some run on a single node because they are coded serially or designed to recognize only a single node. The disclosure notes software packages whose "kernel" (interpreter) is designed to communicate with a single node, citing Mathematica® as an example.

Plain-language scope: Embodiments adapt a software module designed for a single node (such as a Mathematica kernel) to support cluster computing without access to source code, providing parallelization for an application program. One embodiment describes a cluster with first, second, and third processors and kernels, plus cluster node modules that send commands to their respective kernels and communicate with one another; the first cluster node module stores, in a data structure, messages originating from the other modules. Another embodiment includes a user interface and single-node kernel, with a cluster node module that accepts and interprets instructions, appears as a single-node kernel to the user interface, and includes a toolkit implementing MPI calls and high-level cluster commands. Nodes may include Macs, Windows PCs, and Unix/Linux workstations.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, complete specification, detailed description, or drawings; the quoted text is explicitly excerpted and omits material. It also does not establish prosecution history, claim construction, or the content of any prior art.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:44 PM

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11811582. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring