Invalidity dossier
US 10805321
System and method for evaluating network threats and usage
Current assignee: Palantir Technologies Inc
Added 9/23/2026, 5:04:11 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US10805321B2
Title: System and method for evaluating network threats and usage
Patent number: US10805321B2
Assignee/Current Assignee: Palantir Technologies Inc. (original assignee also Palantir Technologies Inc.)
Inventor: Alexander Visbal
Key dates:
- Priority date: 2014-01-03
- Application number: US16/256,862; Filing date: 2019-01-24
- Publication of US20190158515A1: 2019-05-23
- Publication of US10805321B2 / application granted: 2020-10-13
- Anticipated expiration: 2034-01-03
- Legal status: Active
Purpose (plain language): The patent relates to systems and techniques for generating scores representing the threat reputation and usage of respective IP addresses. It addresses shortcomings of IP address blacklists and whitelists, which "have to be updated periodically and contain many false positives," and notes that traditional methods of classifying an IP address as a threat "can mistakenly classify IP addresses of employees and authorized users as threats."
Plain-language scope (from the supplied claims/definitions excerpt): A computer system with one or more processors and a tangible storage device storing modules that cause the system to: determine an IP address for which a threat score is to be determined; access data sources comprising recorded network threat events, date and time of each event, an originating IP address for each event, and/or an event type for each event; determine which data sources include occurrences of the IP address, where each occurrence indicates a threat by that IP address; and, for each data source for which the IP address is a member of the corresponding data [text truncated in the excerpt].
Classifications: H04L63/14 family (malicious-traffic detection), including H04L63/1408, H04L63/1416, H04L63/1425, H04L63/1433, H04L63/1441, H04L63/145, H04L63/101, H04L63/0209, and H04L63/0272.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10805321](/patent/US10805321)/en
What the excerpt does not establish: The full claim set, the complete specification, detailed scoring algorithms, or the remaining claim steps (the excerpt is explicitly truncated). It also does not establish examination history, prior art, validity, or enforcement.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:52 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10805321. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.