Invalidity dossier

US 10638810

Rapid-entry footwear having a compressible lattice structure

Current assignee: Fast IP LLC

Added 8/26/2026, 10:41:22 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 10638810 B1

Title: Rapid-entry footwear having a compressible lattice structure

Patent number / application: US 10638810 B1; application US 16/720,382

Inventors: Craig Cheney; Steven Hermann

Assignee: Fast IP LLC (original assignee per the source; listed as current assignee on the page)

Key dates: Priority date 2019-01-07; filed 2019-12-19; granted/published 2020-05-05; anticipated expiration 2039-12-19. Status: Active.

Classification context (selected): A43B11/00 (footwear arrangements facilitating putting-on/removing); A43B23/02 (uppers); A43C11/00 (other fastenings).

Purpose (plain language): The patent describes a "rapid-entry shoe" designed for easy donning and doffing. The shoe's heel portion has a compressible lattice structure that can be squeezed down under the foot/heel and then recoils back up once the downward force is removed. This lets the shoe open with an expanded opening to receive a foot, then bias back toward a closed position with a smaller opening to retain the foot.

Scope (plain language): The compressible lattice structure comprises one or a plurality of interconnected, overlapping, intersecting and/or woven ribs defining one or more apertures (e.g., diamond-like or other shapes). The apertures are described as open, pass-through slots or holes extending completely through the lattice structure, and not mere folds, pleats, surface grooves, or surface channels. The lattice structure is described as distinct from ordinary fabric/textile because it is reversibly compressible and recoils; it may be a unitary structure formed from a single mold and may comprise a polymer, metallic, or composite material. The disclosure also describes lattice stabilizers, filled voids, upper and lower flanges, a yoke, and a split lattice structure.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10638810/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not state the exact claims, specific dimensions or materials selected for any embodiment, the full written description, or the exact figures' content. Since only an excerpt was supplied, no claim limitations, embodiments, litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art conclusions are established here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:51 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10638810. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.