Invalidity dossier
US 10622310
Method for fabricating glass substrate package
Current assignee: Myw Semitech LLC
Added 9/23/2026, 11:34:36 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US10622310B2
Title: Method for fabricating glass substrate package
Patent number / application: US10622310B2; application US15/261,956; earlier publication US20170047313A1.
Inventor: Ping-Jung Yang.
Assignee: Original assignee listed as "Individual"; current assignee listed as Myw Semitech LLC (the source states listed assignees may be inaccurate).
Key dates: Priority date (stated as an assumption) 2012-09-26; filing date 2016-09-11; publication date 2020-04-14; status Active, with adjusted expiration listed as 2034-01-15. Related filings noted: priority claimed from US14/036,256 (2013-09-25), and priorities to TW105129681A and CN201610820010.9A (2016-09-13).
Purpose and plain-language scope: The supplied text identifies the invention only as a "Method for fabricating glass substrate package." Its prior-art keywords — layer, metal, micrometers, display panel, OLED display — indicate the disclosed subject matter concerns fabricating a package on a glass substrate, involving a metal layer and micrometer-scale dimensions, in the context of display panels and OLED displays. No claim language, abstract, or detailed description is included in the excerpt, so the specific steps, layer compositions, thicknesses, and claim scope cannot be stated from the supplied material.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10622310](/patent/US10622310)/en
What the excerpt does not establish:
- The text of any claim, the abstract, or the specification; therefore the actual scope of protection is not established.
- Whether the listed assignee, priority date, or adjusted expiration is legally accurate — the source expressly labels these as assumptions or potentially inaccurate.
- Any litigation, ownership transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis (excluded per instructions; the excerpt merely flags "Family has litigation" and records reassignments without substantive detail).
- That the keyword list fully or accurately characterizes the invention.
This overview is limited strictly to the supplied excerpt.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:54 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10622310. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.