Patent 9092352
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
The USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Open Data Portal API indicates no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 9092352 as of the most recent ingest. A comprehensive web search also did not reveal any Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) proceedings for this patent.
Strategic summary
There are no known PTAB proceedings (IPR, PGR, or CBM) that have challenged or modified the claims of US Patent 9092352. All claims of the patent are currently untested by AIA trial proceedings. This means there is no estoppel landscape established by PTAB decisions for this patent, and all prior-art grounds remain available for potential future challenges.
Recommended next steps
Given the absence of any PTAB activity, a defendant facing assertion of US Patent 9092352 would find all claims of the patent to be untarnished by AIA trial challenges. The lack of PTAB proceedings suggests that the patent's validity has not been tested in this forum. If facing an assertion, a defendant could consider filing an IPR petition as a potential defensive strategy, exploring grounds under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (novelty) and § 103 (obviousness) based on available prior art.
Generated 5/25/2026, 6:45:46 PM