Patent 8798647

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8798647. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Here is a list of known litigation involving US patent 8798647:

  1. Case: X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies Inc.

    • Plaintiff(s): X One, Inc.
    • Defendant(s): Uber Technologies Inc.
    • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    • Case Number: 5:16-cv-06050
    • Filing Date: October 20, 2016
    • Outcome/Current Status: A California federal judge rejected Uber's bid to dismiss the case on March 7, 2017. This district court litigation appears to have led to the subsequent Inter Partes Review (IPR) at the PTAB.

  2. Case: Uber Technologies, Inc. v. X One, Inc.

    • Plaintiff(s) (Petitioner): Uber Technologies, Inc.
    • Defendant(s) (Patent Owner): X One, Inc.
    • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
    • Case Number: IPR2017-01264
    • Filing Date: The Final Written Decision was issued around October 15, 2018.
    • Outcome/Current Status: The PTAB declined to find certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,798,647 unpatentable as obvious. This decision was subsequently appealed to the Federal Circuit.

  3. Case: Uber Technologies, Inc. v. X One, Inc.

    • Plaintiff(s) (Appellant): Uber Technologies, Inc.
    • Defendant(s) (Appellee): X One, Inc.
    • Jurisdiction: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)
    • Case Number: 19-1165
    • Filing Date: The decision was rendered on March 3, 2020. Oral arguments for the appeal occurred on December 2, 2019.
    • Outcome/Current Status: The Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB's determination of non-obviousness regarding independent claims 1, 22, and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 8,798,647. The court vacated the determination for the dependent claims and remanded the case back to the PTAB for further proceedings on those claims.

  4. Case: X One, Inc. v. DoorDash, Inc. et al

    • Plaintiff(s): X One, Inc.
    • Defendant(s): DoorDash, Inc.
    • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    • Case Number: 2:2026cv00312
    • Filing Date: April 17, 2026
    • Outcome/Current Status: This is a newly filed patent case and is currently active/open.

  5. Case: X One, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, LLC et al

    • Plaintiff(s): X One, Inc.
    • Defendant(s): Pizza Hut, LLC et al.
    • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    • Case Number: 2:26-cv-00314
    • Filing Date: April 17, 2026
    • Outcome/Current Status: This is a newly filed patent infringement case and is currently active/open.

No specific details regarding CAFC case 20-1657 linked directly to US patent 8798647 were found in the provided search results.

Generated 6/4/2026, 12:46:21 AM