8798647

Uber sought inter partes review, arguing claims of patent 9185522 were obvious. The PTAB initially found the claims not unpatentable, but the Federal Circuit reversed, finding the Board erred in its obviousness determination regarding specific claim limitations.

X One, Inc. sued Uber Technologies, Inc. in the Northern District of California. The district court granted Uber's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patents 8,798,593 and 8,798,647; the narrative states the '458 was not asserted in this case.