Patent 12167415
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There is no PTAB activity on file for US patent 12167415. This means the patent has not been challenged through inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), or covered business method (CBM) review. For a defendant, this indicates that all claims of the patent are currently presumed valid and have not been subjected to administrative scrutiny at the USPTO.
Strategic summary
As of today, 2026-07-06, all claims of US patent 12167415 are untested by AIA trial proceedings. This means that if a defendant is facing an assertion of this patent, all claims (1-20) are currently considered valid as issued by the USPTO. There are no estoppel implications under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) as no petition has been instituted.
Recommended next steps
If you are a defendant facing assertion of US patent 12167415, the absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent has not yet faced the scrutiny of an AIA trial. This could mean it is a relatively new patent being asserted, or that prior art challenges through the PTAB have not been pursued. Consider conducting a thorough prior art search to evaluate potential grounds for an IPR or PGR, depending on the patent's priority date and issuance timeline. If an IPR or PGR petition is filed, it would initiate a statutory one-year trial period from institution.
Generated 7/6/2026, 6:04:48 PM