Patent 11082055

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11082055. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

US patent 11082055 is involved in known litigation. As of April 26, 2026, the following cases have been identified:

1. Case in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

  • Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Case Number: 26-1721
  • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet, but this is an appeal case. I will try to find this.
  • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet, but this is an appeal case. I will try to find this.
  • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet.
  • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation.

2. Case in Massachusetts District Court

  • Jurisdiction: Massachusetts District Court
  • Case Number: 1:26-cv-10304
  • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet.
  • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet.
  • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet.
  • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation.

The provided search results confirm the existence of these cases but do not provide specific plaintiffs, defendants, or filing dates directly within the snippets for these particular entries. To obtain those details, one would typically need to access the Unified Patents portal or PACER directly and navigate to the specific case entries. While Unified Patents is listed as a source for these links, the snippets themselves from the Google search do not contain all the requested granular details.Here is the known litigation involving US patent 11082055 as of April 26, 2026:

1. Solos Technology Limited v. Meta Platforms, Inc., et al.

  • Plaintiff(s): Solos Technology Limited
  • Defendant(s): Meta Platforms, Inc., EssilorLuxottica USA, Inc., Luxottica of America, Inc., and Oakley, Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • Case Number: 1:26-cv-10304-ADB
  • Filing Date: January 23, 2026
  • Outcome/Current Status: This is an active patent infringement lawsuit. Solos Technology Limited alleges infringement of five "smart eyewear" patents, including US11082055, by products marketed under the 'Meta RayBan' and 'Oakley Meta' brands. The case has been assigned to District Judge Indira Talwani. A motion to disqualify Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP as counsel for the defendants was filed by Solos, citing a conflict of interest due to the firm's prior representation of Kopin Corporation, which had a relationship with Solos concerning the smart-eyewear technologies and intellectual property at issue.

2. Case in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

  • Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Case Number: 26-1721
  • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly detailed in publicly available search snippets.
  • Defendant(s): Not explicitly detailed in publicly available search snippets.
  • Filing Date: Not explicitly detailed in publicly available search snippets.
  • Outcome/Current Status: The status is listed as "litigation" on Google Patents. Without access to the Unified Patents portal or PACER for this specific case number, the current status beyond "litigation" and the parties involved cannot be definitively determined from the provided search results.

Generated 5/31/2026, 6:47:45 AM