Patent 10814058
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US patent 10814058. This means the patent's claims have not been challenged at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) proceedings. This gives a defendant no immediate defensive leverage from PTAB invalidations.
Strategic summary
As of the current date, no claims of US10814058 have been challenged, canceled, or sustained through any AIA trial proceedings at the PTAB. All claims of the patent are currently untested by the PTAB.
The absence of PTAB proceedings means there is no estoppel landscape to consider under § 315(e)(2). Any prior-art grounds that could be used to challenge the patent's validity remain available for a potential petitioner.
The lack of PTAB activity is a notable signal. Well-asserted patents often become targets for IPRs or PGRs. Its absence suggests that the patent may not have been aggressively asserted in a way that would provoke such challenges, or that potential challengers have not yet deemed it worthwhile to pursue a PTAB action.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US10814058, there are no specific FWDs to link or trial-stage milestones to monitor. A defendant facing assertion of this patent would need to conduct their own prior art search and validity analysis to determine potential grounds for an IPR or PGR, should they choose to challenge the patent at the PTAB.
Generated 6/22/2026, 6:01:11 PM