The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
Celgene Corporation v. USV Private Limited2:25-cv-06320U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—active
Celgene Corporation v. Apotex Inc.2:18-cv-16395U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—terminated upon consolidation
Celgene Corp. v. (generic ANDA filer)2:18-cv-14111U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—consolidated into 17-cv-3387
Celgene Corporation v. Hetero Labs Limited17-cv-3387U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—consolidated lead case
Celgene Corp. v. Mylan2:19-cv-05802District of New Jersey—dismissed
Untitled case2:18-cv-10775District of New Jersey——
Celgene Corp. v. Sandoz Inc.2:25-cv-16878District of New Jersey—consent judgment
Untitled case26-1581United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—unverified
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. v. Genevant Sciences GmbH1:22-cv-02229U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York—withdrawn/not pursued
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corp. et al.3:23-cv-04200U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey—unverified
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al. v. Motorola Mobility LLC0:13-cv-61358-RSRS.D. Fla. (Southern District of Florida)—unknown
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al. v. Nikon Corporation et al.1:11-cv-01025-SLR-SRFD. Del. (District of Delaware)—dismissed by stipulation
Untitled case1:11-cv-00793-SLRD. Del. (District of Delaware)—unknown
Untitled case21-1672U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—unconfirmed
Unified Patents v. VirnetX Inc.IPR2014-00485; IPR2014-00486USPTO PTAB—not instituted – procedural
Peregrine Data LLC v. Motive Technologies, Inc.1:25-cv-01180D. Del. (Judge Gregory B. Williams)—terminated
VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc.2018-1197U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—affirmed; companion with 17-1368/17-1591
VirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.19-1043U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—affirmed
VirnetX Inc. et al. v. Microsoft Corporation6:07-cv-00080U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division—settled (dismissed with prejudice)
Untitled case12-1158U.S. Supreme Court—disposition unverified