The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
XR Communications, LLC v. Extreme Networks, Inc.2:17-cv-02953U.S. District Court for the Central District of California2017-04-19judgment
XR Communications, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.2:17-cv-02951U.S. District Court for the Central District of California2017-04-19judgment
XR Communications, LLC v. ASUS Computer International et al.2:17-cv-02948U.S. District Court for the Central District of California2017-04-19consolidated; stayed
XR Communications, LLC v. Aruba Networks, Inc.2:17-cv-02945U.S. District Court for the Central District of California2017-04-19consolidated; stayed
XR Communications, LLC v. Newo Corporation d/b/a Amped Wireless5:17-cv-00744U.S. District Court for the Central District of California2017-04-19dismissed
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Fujifilm Holdings Corp. et al.1:17-cv-02924U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois2017-04-18filed
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Fujifilm Holdings Corp.1:17-cv-02924N.D. Ill.2017-04-18—
Celgene Corp. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.2:17-cv-02528D.N.J. (District of New Jersey), Judge Susan D. Wigenton; M.J. Leda D. Wettre2017-04-12unverified
Celgene Corporation v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. et al.2:17-cv-02528U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey2017-04-12settled
Facebook Inc. v. Uniloc USA, Inc.IPR2017-01257USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board2017-04-07Terminated
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al. v. Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore…IPR2017-01181USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)2017-03-28settled
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al. v. Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore…IPR2017-01182U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board2017-03-28terminated - settlement
Gigex, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.1:17-cv-00348U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2017-03-28Dismissed
Gigex, Inc. v. Apple Inc.1:17-cv-00347U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2017-03-28Dismissed
Gigex, Inc. v. AOL LLC1:17-cv-00346U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2017-03-28Dismissed
Manufacturing Resources International, Inc. v. Civiq Smartscapes, LLC et al.1:17-cv-00269U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Judge Richard G. Andrews)2017-03-14Dismissed with prejudice
Implicit, LLC v. Sonos, Inc.1:17-cv-00259-LPSU.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2017-03-10Stayed / Moot
Macronix International Co., Ltd. v. Toshiba Corporation et al.3:17-cv-00462U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California2017-03-07dismissed
Macronix International Co., Ltd. et al. v. Toshiba Corporation et al.337-TA-1046U.S. International Trade Commission (Section 337)2017-03-07settled; remedial orders rescinded
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v. Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.IPR2017-00963USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)2017-02-22institution denied