The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Hulu, LLC2:17-cv-07611Central District of California2017-10-17resolved
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Hulu, LLC2:17-cv-07611C.D. Cal.2017-10-17unknown
Sonos, Inc. v. Implicit, LLCIPR2018-00767U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)2017-10-16Final Written Decision / Claims Unpatentable
Maxell, Ltd. v. BLU Products, Inc.1:17-cv-01447U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Wilmington)2017-10-13closed
Maxell, Ltd. v. BLU Products, Inc.1:17-cv-01447D. Del.2017-10-13unknown
Maxell, Ltd. v. BlackBerry Corporation et al.1:17-cv-01446D. Del.2017-10-13active; '897 count dismissed by stipulation
Maxell, Ltd. v. BlackBerry Corporation et al.1:17-cv-01446U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (D. Del.)2017-10-13resolved
Maxell, Ltd. v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al.2:17-cv-07528 (transferred to 3:18-cv-01788)U.S. District Court for the Central District of California; transferred to U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California2017-10-13settled
Maxell, Ltd. v. BlackBerry Corporation et al.1:17-cv-01446U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware2017-10-13settled/closed
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.6:17-cv-00549E.D. Tex. (Tyler Div.)2017-09-27unknown
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Xerox Corp.1:17-cv-06813N.D. Ill.2017-09-20unknown
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Xerox Corporation1:17-cv-06813U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago)2017-09-20closed
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Xerox Corp.6:18-cv-06746W.D.N.Y. (originally N.D. Ill. 1:17-cv-06813)2017-09-20dismissed by agreement
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Xerox Corporation1:17-cv-06813N.D. Ill.2017-09-20consolidated into MDL
IPA Technologies, Inc. v. ZTE Corp. et al.3:17-cv-01858S.D. Cal.2017-09-13—
LG Electronics, Inc. v. Uniloc 2017 LLCIPR2017-02087Patent Trial and Appeal Board2017-09-11Final Written Decision; all challenged claims unpatentable
Orthosie Systems, LLC v. OnStar, LLC3:17-cv-01857California Southern District Court2017-09-08Unknown
Celgene Corp. v. Lotus Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al.2:17-cv-06842United States District Court for the District of New Jersey2017-09-06consent judgment
Celgene Corporation v. Lotus Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al.2:17-cv-06842D.N.J.2017-09-06settled
Celgene Corporation v. Lotus Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al.2:17-cv-06842District of New Jersey2017-09-06settled/consent judgment