The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
IPR2019-00640IPR2019-00640USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board—settled
Maxell, Ltd. v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al.5:18-cv-00033U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas——
Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. v. Huawei Device USA, Inc.5:16-cv-00178U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division——
Untitled case19-2359; 20-1217U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—decided; affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded
Sionyx, LLC v. Hamamatsu Corporation2018-2019U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—affirmed
SiOnyx LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.19-2359U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded
CAO Group, Inc. v. [Schedule A defendants]1:25-cv-04054N.D. Ill.——
Apple Inc. v. Maxell, Ltd.IPR2020-00597U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board—not instituted
RFCyber Corp. v. Shell Information Technology International, BV2:24-cv-00549-JRGU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Judge Rodney Gilstrap)—dismissed with prejudice
Untitled case26-1623U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—on appeal
Maxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.337-TA-1432U.S. International Trade Commission—unknown
Maxell, Ltd. et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.5:23-cv-00092U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall/Tyler Division—on appeal
Untitled case26-1111U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—unverified
Untitled case2026-1625U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—pending
Untitled case1:18-cv-00310U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware——
Maxell, Ltd. v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al.5:16-cv-00178U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas—resolved/dismissed (settled)
Untitled caseIPR2019-00087USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board—terminated - settlement
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. Maxell, Ltd.IPR2024-00828Patent Trial and Appeal Board—Final Written Decision issued
Untitled case1:17-cv-01447U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware——
Micron Technology, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.1:24-cv-00081U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho—remanded to Idaho state court; federal docket closed